so youre telling me that east africans had coarse hair initially?
Nilo-Saharan people are the original people, not Habesha Afro-Asiatics, fam.
So We (Blacks) Started The Human Race!
- Thread starter BujuBoombastic
- Start date
Nilo-Saharan people are the original people, not Habesha Afro-Asiatics, fam.
Tommy Knocks
retired
they also have fufu hair like oromo.
some of the oldest most unchanged people are the abos, and they also have straight hair.
even the bushmen, in fact its only west and central africans and we know damn well we arent the first folks here.
they also have fufu hair like oromo.
some of the oldest most unchanged people are the abos, and they also have straight hair.
even the bushmen, in fact its only west and central africans and we know damn well we arent the first folks here.
nikkas like Lupita and Luol Deng don't have straight here
Tommy Knocks
retired
you got proof we come from them?nikkas like Lupita and Luol Deng don't have straight here
Blackout
just your usual nerdy brotha
No Aztec pride?
Brown_Pride
All Star
not really. I really only feel a sense of pride for people in my family i've met. I'm amazed at the shyt they did just like i'm amazed at the shyt the egyptians did.
they also have fufu hair like oromo.
some of the oldest most unchanged people are the abos, and they also have straight hair.
even the bushmen, in fact its only west and central africans and we know damn well we arent the first folks here.
I see I'm replying to Ray Charles
Oromo
After animal fat is applied, which makes what we call in the west, a Jerry curl. Another black phenomenon.
The Bushmen
As far as the Aborigine, they are people who traveled away from the Mother land of Africa(for ALL Humans), so it would make sense that their hair turned straight because they would have went pass cold lands and waters, and needed to keep their neck region, along with the scalp to be warm, so the hair relaxes, and straightens out, to help provide heat to these areas. It is very important because they hold your important organs, the brain, and thyroid.
You can also see this through their high rates of Blond hair. As they traveled from one land to another, the mutation needed to make straight hair, didn't also upregulate the melanin synthesizing compounds, and therefore, their hair lacked blackness, so what would that mean? A more yellowish, brownish, color would be developed. Once they settled, and had more access to food, they were able synthesize color back into their hair but, because they interbred with each other, the genes that create blond, and straight hair, were passed down, and expresses itself once in a while. This same biology mutation happened to everyone else who left Africa!
Last edited:
GetInTheTruck
Member
aborigines are as genetically distant from africans as white people and chinese people. they show some affinity to south indian tribal populations who aren't african either.
I don't know whats the point of posting this but, if you are trying to say that different groups in the world just formed in the lands they are in now, then you are Wrong!
Indians come from Africans as well as Aborigines. In fact India was the main first stop for a large population since leaving Africa. We went through this in the "buddah" thread. I gave you another link about this but this one is from National Geographic. The other was an Asian newspaper article.
Y'all really think different "races" just appeared out of nowhere, and populated the earth? If that were true, do you know how special Humans would be in the theory of evolution? That would mean, four monkeys, or apes, mutated into different types of humans who look different, and all four had the capabilities to conquer the world! The odds of that happening is so ridiculous that its not even a thought. And you(get in the truck) should at least know where man originates, and how he got to different places on the earth. That is the basics of history!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1114_051114_india_2.html
Early Humans Settled India Before Europe, Study Suggests
Modern humans migrated out of Africa and into India much earlier than once believed, driving older hominids in present-day India to extinction and creating some of the earliest art and architecture, a new study suggests.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2262843/Migrants-India-settled-Australia-4-000-years-ago-Captain-Cooks-arrival-took-dingos-them.html
Migrants from India settled in Australia 4,000 years ago before Captain Cook's arrival (and they took their dingos with them)
Australia was settled by a wave of immigrants from India little more than 4,000 years ago, a genetic study shows.
The finding overturns the view that the continent was isolated from the time it was first colonised about 45,000-50,000 years ago until Europeans discovered Australia in the eighteenth century.
DNA evidence suggests that rather than complete most of the journey over several generations by foot, the Indian migrants came over by boat.
Australia’s first human colonisation was the culmination of the long walk out of Africa by the human species.
Humans are believed to have left Africa, via the Arabian coast and through India before reaching Indonesia and New Guinea and finally over an ancient land bridge to Australia.
Following their arrival there was, according to ‘the prevailing view’, little if any contact between Australia’s Aboriginal inhabitants and the rest of the world.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/science/23aborigines.html?_r=0
Australian Aborigine Hair Tells a Story of Human Migration
The Aboriginal genome bolsters earlier genetic evidence showing that once the Aborigines’ ancestors arrived in Australia, some 50,000 years ago, they somehow kept the whole continent to themselves without admitting any outsiders.
The Aborigines are thus direct descendants of the first modern humans to leave Africa, without any genetic mixture from other races so far as can be seen at present. Their dark skin reflects an African origin and a migration and residence in latitudes near the equator, unlike Europeans and Asians whose ancestors gained the paler skin necessary for living in northern latitudes.
Last edited:
GetInTheTruck
Member
Humans left Africa and settled in different parts of the world where they, yes, "formed" their identities and ethnic classifications over thousands of years, this includes the white man. If Aborigines are "African," then so are white people.
Australian Aborigines are Australian, Indians are Indians, and Africans are Africans.
Humans are humans.
But, I wrote that in the post you replied to
Here's the quote:
"As far as the Aborigine, they are people who traveled away from the Mother land of Africa(for ALL Humans)"
I was explaining to tommy how straight hair came to be. Reread the last few posts because, you got lost somewhere.
GetInTheTruck
Member
But, I wrote that in the post you replied to
Here's the quote:
"As far as the Aborigine, they are people who traveled away from the Mother land of Africa(for ALL Humans)"
I was explaining to tommy how straight hair came to be. Reread the last few posts because, you got lost somewhere.
As long as you agree that Aborigines have as much to do with Africa as a white European we are all square.
This isn't fully true, though.
Aborigines retained most of their African features because they were the first to leave.
I think you may think I hate white people or something but, I have stated numerous times that I don't hate white people in general BUT, I'm aware how this world works, and who is doing what, so I say the truth. Unfortunately, if you say bad about whites, your seen as "militant", or "pro black" meaning you hate everything but black people, and that is far from the case with me. I just like the truth.
As far as whites being connected to Africa, I have said in other posts that white people are really just "black people" with no color, and features designed to survive harsh, cold environments. They are new to earth, and around 6000 years old. This was said by Elijah Muhammad, and has been proven in the science field. What I'm trying to figure out is why did they go towards such harsh environments? Is it because they received a mark as the story goes about Cain in the bible or is there another reason.
The mark does make sense because, being white would have been a freak occurrence back then because everyone were shades of brown, and seeing someone with blond hair, blue eyes, and almost white skin, would be like seeing something from out of this world. This person or group would also have to leave the warm lands of a "Garden" and go towards a place where it is cooler, and not as much intense sun, so they would need to move towards eastern, and northern latitudes.
On another note, I was investigating this, and it hit me that the garden of eden in the bible was most likely INDIA! Adam, and Eve were most likely Indians, and Cain was their offspring. This theory makes sense to me because Indians have strong features of white people, except the skin of course.
I'm looking more into this but, so far, I think the garden of eden was what is now India, and the tenders of the garden were Adam, and Eve. They weren't the first people on earth, just the workers for the garden. People tend to misread the story.
Heres an article on the garden of eden being in what is now India:
http://www.opednews.com/populum/pag...le-Say-the-Gar-by-Barry-Brown-130501-923.html
"According to tradition, Year One of the 5772-year-old Hebrew/Jewish calendar marks the time when Adam and Eve left Eden and journeyed west. There are 3 clues we can take from this story in a search for its roots in real history: 1) It happened about 6,000 years ago, 2) It involved the ancestors of the Hebrew people who are the ancestors of the Jewish people, 3) The fall of a peaceful, Eden-like civilization led to the outward, western migration of people from that older area.
Is there some recorded, major world event that meets all those criteria? Yes. About 6,000 years ago, a great peaceful kingdom in ancient India was torn apart in a civil war between royal cousins and their allies. At the end of this war, called the War at Kurukshetra, 4 million men -- three generations of males -- were dead. In the post-war chaos of the "new order" millions of people began to migrate away from the Ganges River region in eastern India. With great hopes that they could establish a new and better civilization of peace and prosperity, these migrants from the east founded a new kingdom along the banks of the Indus River in western India."
EDIT: I was thinking more on thi, and I just realized that Cain(of the bible) May have been the creation of white Asians such as the Chinese. If you read the story, it writes Cain went east to the land of nod! If we can see the garden of eden was in India, going east would be to what is now China. Now, the word nod has multiple meanings but, I find it funny that East Asians tend to Nod as a cultural thing for THOUSANDS of years. But, we can also see The east Asian area is where the serpent is heavily praised. We also know they had a very violent beginning, such as the character Cain was known for having. I think reading the bible, along with studying history, gives you a deeper learning of life, and what is happening in the world.
Last edited:
But, I think some of those feature may have been lost or exaggerated because they kept to themselves, and that means inbreeding. With inbreeding more bad genes would be expressed then if people had a larger pool to procreate with.
I don't think original Africans looked like the Aborigines because they had more access to different women who would have more different genes to mix with. And more access to better quality of food which also effect looks.