So we gonna act like Casino Royale(2006) isn't the GOAT and quintessential Bond film and >Skybore

Jazzy B.

Veteran
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
18,010
Reputation
3,295
Daps
65,831
Bond :ohlawd:

The Bond girl :ohlawd:


The intro :ohlawd:

The intesity :ohlawd:

The story :ohlawd:

The locations :ohlawd:


The Poker game:ohlawd:

The action scenes(god damn that iconstruction scene was too damn good):ohlawd:


The music :ohlawd:



This movie was perfect, Martin Campbell(the director, also did Goldeneye) :blessed:.


Skyfall was trash, the plot was crap, :heh: story made no sense and wasn't engaging , terribly unrealistic(all that stuff with the villain was :why::duck:) you could tell they were making it up as they went along, the villain was also terrible, the action was bland only good thing about it was the song. Overhyped and boring movie. Sam Mendes directing the next film :beli::snoop:.


They need to bring Martin Campbell back, this man knows how to do Bond properly and make an exhilarating film at the same time.




:wow: when I first saw that in the cinemas.



God damn!!!
 

karim

Superstar
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
11,912
Reputation
21
Daps
44,789
Reppin
NULL
casino royale was a very good bond movie, the only problem i have with it is that the end isn't very well structured. there already was a climax and then the whole venice thing happens. that way, the movie feels overly long.

i didn't understand the hype about skyfall. the first half of it is classic bond with the added element of constant supervision from hq/m which i thought was a pretty cool way to adapt the franchise to the 21st century. But in the second half you realize that the plot is pretty thin and when they go to scottland the movie looses track. the whole mother son relationship bond had with m was a good idea but they should have done it more subtle. so overall, casino royale is the best bond since the reboot and far superior to skyfall. goldeneye on the other hand was pretty crap, it was cool in the 90's but feels outdated as fukk by now.
 

Scientific Playa

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
13,930
Reputation
3,300
Daps
24,905
Reppin
Championships
U can't eff with the numbers

Casino Royale (2006 film)

Budget $150 million
Box office $599,045,960


Skyfall

Budget $150–200 million

Box office $1,108,561,013

1 billion dollars visualized as... 1 billion dollars

one_billion_dollars.jpg


artmarcovici-billion1.jpg


one_billion_dollars2.jpg
 
  • Dap
Reactions: NZA
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
75,345
Reputation
13,762
Daps
264,084
Reppin
206 & 734
U can't eff with the numbers

Casino Royale (2006 film)

Budget $150 million
Box office $599,045,960


Skyfall

Budget $150–200 million

Box office $1,108,561,013

1 billion dollars visualized as... 1 billion dollars

one_billion_dollars.jpg


artmarcovici-billion1.jpg


one_billion_dollars2.jpg
First of all that is a stupid way to judge film quality

Secondly, thunderball STILL outgrossed skyfall inflation adjusted, and goldfinger grossed 950MM adjusted. Both are defintely better than skyfall too.
 
Top