ill
Superstar
If you call God, Mother Nature, then you would be on the right track. Theres no reason to have an omnipotent presence to describe nature.
So who made god?
- Thread starter JAY?
- Start date
If you call God, Mother Nature, then you would be on the right track. Theres no reason to have an omnipotent presence to describe nature.
no it's a special teapot with no material that you can understand, this teapot willed the world into existence
you did not answer the first question at all
you bout to dance this whole thread
Namekian Maranantha
...Ammmeeeen.
Indeed. It's hell. I reccomend looking into a subject called the Law of Reverse Effort by famed French Psychologist Emile Coue.
The law of Reversed Effort basically points out as a fact that, there are certain things which, if you tried to do, you will undo -- Like sleeping. This is the problem with most insomniacs (not saying you are necessarily one) but most seem to have some kind of 'ritual' to 'make' sleep happen. But its impractical ( i would even say unhealthy) to 'make' sleep happen - "Every deliberate effort will make you more aware, more alert and sleep will be put off."
Sleep musn't be pursued, but persuaded if you will...
Do you accept this? May we consider can there be so-called "nothing" without that which has been named "something"? OR "Something" without "Nothing"?
Would we say there could be something named "Light" apart from what is named "Dark"? or the idea of "UP" without that of "down"?
no it's a special teapot with no material that you can understand, this teapot willed the world into existence
you did not answer the first question at all
you bout to dance this whole thread
No dancing required. The big bang is not up for debate at this point in time in academia. You still have the issue that something came from NOTHING. What caused the big bang cannot be defined by what existed AFTERWARDS.
Do you accept this? May we consider can there be so-called "nothing" without that which has been named "something"? OR "Something" without "Nothing"?
Would we say there could be something named "Light" apart from what is named "Dark"? or the idea of "UP" without that of "down"?
So far there is no evidence pointing to other options. It has been game on since Hubble discovered the red shift. Scientists even agree dark matter didn't exist before the big bang.
Aristotle once said nothing is what rocks dream about. Anything relating to matter on any plane would violate that and not be able to be called nothing.
Indeed. It's hell. I reccomend looking into a subject called the Law of Reverse Effort by famed French Psychologist Emile Coue.
The law of Reversed Effort basically points out as a fact that, there are certain things which, if you tried to do, you will undo -- Like sleeping. This is the problem with most insomniacs (not saying you are necessarily one) but most seem to have some kind of 'ritual' to 'make' sleep happen. But its impractical ( i would even say unhealthy) to 'make' sleep happen - "Every deliberate effort will make you more aware, more alert and sleep will be put off."
Sleep musn't be pursued, but persuaded if you will...
Do you accept this? May we consider can there be so-called "nothing" without that which has been named "something"? OR "Something" without "Nothing"?
Would we say there could be something named "Light" apart from what is named "Dark"? or the idea of "UP" without that of "down"?
Yeah. I'm gonna look into that
Thanks for the heads up
Last edited:
I won't get into electromagnetic energy and the particular human definition of darkness, but that aside,
This notion makes me think about the definition of space-time as something which can only exist (and is defined) as a manifestation of energy/forces promulgating through it
you doing a jig right now
You the only one debating that
burning up a rug there bud
like you who came after the big bang can't define God, but wants to tell everyone you can?
Claim god exists while admitting that axiomatically they can't define God brehs
me? what about your God?
my teapot>>>>your god
So what has your teapot done besides being conjured up for this discussion?
My teapot made the universe, it existed before the big bang
your inability to understand it does not surprise me
Irony blindness brehs
You the only one debating that
burning up a rug there bud
like you who came after the big bang can't define God, but wants to tell everyone you can?
Claim god exists while admitting that axiomatically they can't define God brehs
What did you learn about in science class as a kid regarding the creation of the universe? The big bang which is still taught in class today? I'm not defining God by what came after the big bang so why do you say I am?
I have always said God is spaceless, timeless and immaterial which is different from space, time and matter.
My teapot made the universe, it existed before the big bang
your inability to understand it does not surprise me
Irony blindness brehs
The Bible is God's word and to this day there is no archeological evidence that contradicts it. We have found cities, records of people, even chariot parts in a strip from the parting of the sea.
Sorry breh but unless the bible came before the big bang, you already said
so the bible can't tell us anything about god
I told you you will be
all threadthis is so much fun:zfg: