Bron "Stans" are more aligned with objective heads than anybody else's "stans"...
Never in NBA history has anybody cared if you won your rings with one team or multiple teams....until it came to LeBron.
Never in NBA history did mf's put more weight on Finals losses, than Finals wins, until LeBron. Never in NBA history did mf's look at getting to the NBA Finals and losing, as a lesser feat, than losing before the NBA Finals....until LeBron.
Mf's always understood it's a game where you can lose if the other team is better...until LeBron.
Kobe has 5 rings but won only two of them as a #1. And I'm using "only" facestiously, because that's not an easy feat. The NBA has been around for 79 years, and only 16 guys have been the best player on
more than one championship team:
(8) Bill (8-1)
(6) Mike (6-0)
(5) Mikan (5-0)
(4) LeBron (4-6), Duncan (4-0)
(3) Kareem (3-3), Magic (3-2), Bird (3-2), Shaq (3-1)
(2) Wilt (2-4), Kobe (2-2), KD (2-2), Hakeem (2-1), Steph (2-1), Zeke (2-1), Cowens (2-0)
It's a major accomplishment, and Kobe's being in that class, is a huge reason why he's a Top 10 player ever. But of those 16 guys, 9 guys have 3+ championships as the best player on a title team. Neither Steph nor Kobe are in that category and they are typically ranked accordingly...
If Steph ends his career with more rings than LeBron, we'll salute him. Nothing Steph does is any threat whatsoever to LeBron's career, and with him already in Y16, it's virtually impossible he'll match LeBron's chips as a #1, let alone surpass it...
Steph's legacy stands on its own merits (as did Kobe's), it's only threatening to LeBron by you nikkas who don't appreciate Bron