Sony Won't Refund PS4 User Who Lost $600 From Hack

[MeachTheMonster]

Is it not?

They can take your games away from you at will. Y'all were so up in arms about ownership. Does this dude truly own his digital titles?

 

[Fatboi1]

breh, there could be a 50 page thread on some random microsoft policy that affects almost nobody that will buy the x1, but sony literally tries to debo some dude outta 600$ and this shyt is dead.

what happens when we get to the point where people have hundreds of dollars worth of games tied to their psn? will sony start bullying people into not complaining about their shyt service, that we all pay for, by threatening to wipe their games?

Receipts?? Because this isn't really true at all. When was the last time some minor policy or whatnot came out involving the larrybox and there were pages upon pages of discussion? The last time I vividly remember a huge discussion over Microsoft anything was around the launch of the consoles which Microsoft warranted. Sounds like some sort of victim complex.

 

[5n0man]

Receipts?? Because this isn't really true at all. When was the last time some minor policy or whatnot came out involving the larrybox and there were pages upon pages of discussion? The last time I vividly remember a huge discussion over Microsoft anything was around the launch of the consoles which Microsoft warranted. Sounds like some sort of victim complex.

im not gonna play these games, you know what im talking about breh, you nikkas wouldnt shut up about the bullshyt paywalls microsoft had, the always online shyt, the kinect shyt, you nikkas claim microsoft is the sole reason we pay for online multiplayer now. you know exactly what im talking about.

you know why you havnt heard any of this lately? because microsoft is actively changing all their bullshyt to cater to their customers, like any decent company would.

you know who doesnt give a shyt about catering to customers? sony

 

[The Mad Titan]

Microsoft wanted DRM on there systems so that games could be shared freely.

All this BS wouldn't even be a issue if people wouldn't have boo'd DRM from jump, you'd literally have 10 other people that could play whatever they wanted of yours and you of there's. Xbox would check in every 24 hours and that would be a wrap.


Now fools essentially have DRM don't own what they buy and if they share it the wrong way it gets taken from them.

 

[The Mad Titan]

im not gonna play these games, you know what im talking about breh, you nikkas wouldnt shut up about the bullshyt paywalls microsoft had, the always online shyt, the kinect shyt, you nikkas claim microsoft is the sole reason we pay for online multiplayer now. you know exactly what im talking about.

you know why you havnt heard any of this lately? because microsoft is actively changing all their bullshyt to cater to their customers, like any decent company would.

you know who doesnt give a shyt about catering to customers? sony

This too true, PSN is free, I heard that so much. People hated on the fact that you had to pay for live.

PSN started charging and you didn't hear a peep from the sony crowd. If microsoft would have done that all hell would have broken loose.

 

[Fatboi1]

im not gonna play these games, you know what im talking about breh, you nikkas wouldnt shut up about the bullshyt paywalls microsoft had, the always online shyt, the kinect shyt, you nikkas claim microsoft is the sole reason we pay for online multiplayer now. you know exactly what im talking about.

What does that have to do with this situation?? Some breh got his credentials got, he got the situation rectified by Sony. This ain't the same as some policy that will affect every costumer .

you know why you havnt heard any of this lately? because microsoft is actively changing all their bullshyt to cater to their customers, like any decent company would.

You know why they're doing this?? Because they're in second place. They can't sit back and be on some bullshyt while Sony eating their food breh.

you know who doesnt give a shyt about catering to customers? sony

Sounds like a load of bullshyt to me breh. Dude in the situation here got the shyt taken care of. I've heard both sides of the story where a customer didn't get what he wanted from Sony and I heard from dudes saying Sony catered to them well. The thing that differentiates this situation is each user has something different going on.

 

[Fatboi1]

This too true, PSN is free, I heard that so much. People hated on the fact that you had to pay for live.

PSN started charging and you didn't hear a peep from the sony crowd. If microsoft would have done that all hell would have broken loose.

Yea, you did. You guys to love act like nobody be calling out Sony when they do shyt that's wrong. Essentially, Sony just made PS+ a requirement for PS4, something people already had on PS3.

PSN is STILL free on PS3 and PS Vita. Hell, PS+ is a better value than Xbox Live Gold breh, tell me I'm lying .

As for this "People hated on live for having to pay" shyt.. That's a bold faced lie. People always boasted about how "You get what you pay for" in regards to XBL. The only thing people didn't like was having apps like netflix behind the Gold paywall. All this Sony gets their shyt sweeped under the rug is straight up bs. The reason you don't hear much outrage is because there isn't really shyt to be outraged about.

 

[5n0man]

What does that have to do with this situation?? Some nikka got his got, he got the situation rectified. This ain't the same as some policy that will affect every costumer .



You know why they're doing this?? Because they're in second place. They can't sit back and be on some bullshyt while Sony eating their food breh.

Sounds like a load of bullshyt to me breh. Dude in the situation here got the shyt taken care of. I've heard both sides of the story where a customer didn't get what he wanted from Sony and I heard from dudes saying Sony catered to them well. The thing that differentiates this situation is each user has something different going on.

This is where you sound like a shill, dude got got and Sony told him he was on his own, and that they could only give him 150$ in psn store credit even though he had got robbed of 600$, they said it was against their policy to give him his money back, that's a policy that could potentially affect everyone seeing how unsecured psn seems to be.

They also said he would have to wait 6 months before he can aquire primary ownership of the account because it's their policy,during that time I assume the hacker retains ownership till the 6 months is up or he deactivates it himself, again, another policy that could affect everyone. Yeah the rectified this issue, but only after they tried to bully him into eating the 600$ loss, even threatened to ban him if he took it up with the bank. They didn't do shyt for him till he went public and they heard the outcry brewing.

You may have heard that people were taken care of but the common theme seems to be that Sony is hard to deal with, I had first hand experience of this.

Being in second has seem to make Microsoft hussle to make their console better.

Sony seems like they are getting too cocky being in first.

Why is your first post in this thread, caping for a greedy corporation?

 

[Fatboi1]

This is where you sound like a shill, dude got got and Sony told him he was on his own, and that they could only give him 150$ in psn store credit even though he had got robbed of 600$, they said it was against their policy to give him his money back, that's a policy that could potentially affect everyone seeing how unsecured psn seems to be.

That policy seems to be in place because some dudes be scheming. Initially, Sony wouldn't be wise to accept everyone's claim of "I WAS HACKED, i GOT MY STUFF STOLEN!!!".

They also said he would have to wait 6 months before he can aquire primary ownership of the account because it's their policy,during that time I assume the hacker retains ownership till the 6 months is up or he deactivates it himself, again, another policy that could affect everyone. Yeah the rectified this issue, but only after they tried to bully him into eating the 600$ loss, even threatened to ban him if he took it up with the bank.

They didn't bully him, he agreed to the TOS. It's not Sony's fault people don't read. It's the user fault for accepting the TOS. A vigilant gamer would not be susceptible to such nefarious and unscrupulous tactics. For most, we just acquiesce since there's no better alternative.. I mean what?? Go play on Xbox??

You may have heard that people were taken care of but the common theme seems to be that Sony is hard to deal with, I had first hand experience of this.

Being in second has seem to make Microsoft hussle to make their console better.

Ok? All that hustling still hasn't converted into a truly better console. It's better in the sense of comparing it to it's initial launch, but the X1 is FAR behind PS4 overall in terms of features, games and upcoming content.

Sony seems like they are getting too cocky being in first.

Because they didn't give breh his $600 at first??

Why is your first post in this thread, caping for a greedy corporation?

Caping?? I said Sony prolly don't got $600 to give dudeman.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

but only one of those platforms are completely unwilling to properly assist their customer after getting their account compromised.

like ive said, ive dealt with sony over suspect transactions on my account. i literally had to argue with them just to get them to LOOK INTO the shyt, let alone actually do something about it. i didnt get my money back cause it was such a hassle trying to just get them to open up an investigation, i just never contacted them to find out the results. id rather just take the 20$ loss

Patronize Sony brehs

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

i have no idea why i cant neg but you deserve one breh.

outrage when its shytty policies like needing live to watch netflix, but doesnt care when its a shytty policy involving the console of your choice, therefore more likely to affect you.

but rekka got that amex, he dont give a fukk about tha rest .

but rekka was mad as fukk when microsoft didnt give a shyt about nikkas without internet.


matter fact, ps4 nikkas are noticeably absent from this thread, guess they dont care about policies that directly affect them.

I'm glad your waking up to the bullshyt friend. Join us on the green side for secure, worry free gaming.

 

[5n0man]

That policy seems to be in place because some dudes be scheming. Initially, Sony wouldn't be wise to accept everyone's claim of "I WAS HACKED, i GOT MY STUFF STOLEN!!!".

They didn't bully him, he agreed to the TOS. It's not Sony's fault people don't read. It's the user fault for accepting the TOS. A vigilant gamer would not be susceptible to such nefarious and unscrupulous tactics. For most, we just acquiesce since there's no better alternative.. I mean what?? Go play on Xbox??



Ok? All that hustling still hasn't converted into a truly better console. It's better in the sense of comparing it to it's initial launch, but the X1 is FAR behind PS4 overall in terms of features, games and upcoming content.

Because they didn't give breh his $600 at first??


Caping?? I said Sony prolly don't got $600 to give dudeman.

What other business first reaction is to argue with a customer when they are notified that fraudulent charges appeared on someone's account?

Most companies worth their shyt has special departments they transfer you to that deals exclusively with theft and compromises of personal information.


They DID bully him, where does it say in the TOS that Sony is not accountable for a breach in your private and that in that senario, your responsible for any losses.They bullied him cause they knew the bank would reverse the charges so they said they would ban his account and delete has games if he took action against their inaction.


As for all that other shyt you typed, if you really believe that shyt then your no better than what you claim @PS4 is.

 

[Fatboi1]

I'm glad your waking up to the bullshyt friend. Join us on the green side for secure, worry free gaming.

 

[KushSkywalker]

Is it not?

They can take your games away from you at will. Y'all were so up in arms about ownership. Does this dude truly own his digital titles?

Not defending this in any way shape or form but aren't all games technically 'lease' agreements?

I've read this before, that technically we are leasing every game we buy, even physical (not sure if this is true)

Pretty sure Microsoft has the right to take away your digital games too

 

[Fatboi1]

What other business first reaction is to argue with a customer when they are notified that fraudulent charges appeared on someone's account?

Most companies worth their shyt has special departments they transfer you to that deals exclusively with theft and compromises of personal information.


They DID bully him, where does it say in the TOS that Sony is not accountable for a breach in your private and that in that senario, your responsible for any losses.They bullied him cause they knew the bank would reverse the charges so they said they would ban his account and delete has games if he took action against their inaction.


As for all that other shyt you typed, if you really believe that shyt then your no better than what you claim @PS4 is.

I don't care.