Maybe you're just happy to give Steve Kerr all the credit for not doing anything.
Jackson inherited a 30 win team, rebuilt that team to a 50 win team, then got fired and Kerr wins 67.
Yeah, takes fukkin brilliance to ride with a 50-win team on the rise.
But I'm sure Mark Jackson was a shytty coach for turning them around and losing in 7 games to the Clippers
Stephen A. Smith shyts on Luke Walton and Kerr
- Thread starter Pdiddy
- Start date
Speaking of David Lee, I remember when brehs on this board shyt on me for valuing bogut over coward. fukk all y'all 
Funny how nikkas get mad when people try to give Mark Jackson credit..........If Luke Walton can have them almost 20-0......then Mark Jackson could have coached that team to a championship.
Walton is running the system Kerr and Gentry and Adams installed. If Walton did things Mark Jackson's way Iggy and David Lee would still be starting, there would be tons of Iso ball, and there would be shytty bench rotations and minutes management likely resulting in more minor (and likely a few major) injuries.
GS was lucky last year though.
If Steve Kerr is such a brilliant mind, why didn't he take his mentor's job offer in New York?
Derek Fisher could win a chip in 3 years and won't nobody ever call his ass a genius or a great basketball mind.
But Steve Kerr.....
Derek Fisher could win a chip in 3 years and won't nobody ever call his ass a genius or a great basketball mind.
But Steve Kerr.....
Chrishaune
Veteran
Breh. You can get this basic ass shyt right outta here. We're not talking about the credit the players deserve - this argument is centered around the coaching.
I'm not giving Kerr all of the credit.
Again, 
all day for Jackson who was simply bad at his job, or at the very best mediocre but undercut his assistants constantly.
But Gentry in Phoenix?
Larry Drew in Milwaukee?
Even Monty?
Fisher is there for the check and nobody blames him.
And Fisher is a good coach for winning any games at all with those D-Leaguers.
all day for Jackson who was simply bad at his job, or at the very best mediocre but undercut his assistants constantly. But Gentry in Phoenix?
Larry Drew in Milwaukee?
Even Monty?
Because New York had a shyt roster built around an aging all-star that is a proven liability to any winning environmentIf Steve Kerr is such a brilliant mind, why didn't he take his mentor's job offer in New York?
Derek Fisher could win a chip in 3 years and won't nobody ever call his ass a genius or a great basketball mind.
But Steve Kerr.....
Fisher is there for the check and nobody blames him. And Fisher is a good coach for winning any games at all with those D-Leaguers.
So Kerr decided to take a better roster that was built up by Jackson.Again,
But Gentry in Phoenix?
Larry Drew in Milwaukee?
Even Monty?
Because New York had a shyt roster built around an aging all-star that is a proven liability to any winning environment
And Fisher is a good coach for winning any games at all with those D-Leaguers.
Kerr and Fisher were both heavily mentored by Jackson.
Why is 1 a genius but one isn't?
Imma let you beat around that bush tho
If given the choice between NY and GS before last season, who the fukk would be considered brilliant for taking NY?
"Brah, you want to go to the steakhouse or go eat out the dumpster behind the gas station?"
Yeah, but there's a reason 1 roster was more appealing than the other.If given the choice between NY and GS before last season, who the fukk would be considered brilliant for taking NY?
"Brah, you want to go to the steakhouse or go eat out the dumpster behind the gas station?"
And it damn sure wasn't Kerr's genius that built it.
duckbutta
eienaar van mans
Another cac exposal thread 
Anybody who doesn't understand what mark jackson did for this team is a fukking idiot...
When he took over this team they were the laughing stock of the nba...the only relevant thing they had done in what...30 years...was bounce a soft ass mavs team in the first round...
He is the person who set the tone for that team not being horrible...he is the one who said we not going to lose...
Mark Jackson inherited a team that couldn't win 37 games for 3 straight years...couldn't win 30 games in back to back years...
He inherited a steph curry who had ankles problems so bad he was barely hanging on as a starting point guard...or do you have another explanation for the contract golden state was able to give him:usurematteroffact:
I don't even see how you can give steve kerr credit for doing anything with this team...they haven't lost a game since he stopped being on the sideline
Does anybody really think steve kerr could have inherited a 36 and 46 team who's point guard was missing every other game due to an ankle injury and turned them into a championship team
Am I the only one who remembers this guy as a GM in Phoenix...I could have sworn the 7 seconds or less era pretty much died when he traded marion for shaq...
Anybody who doesn't understand what mark jackson did for this team is a fukking idiot...
When he took over this team they were the laughing stock of the nba...the only relevant thing they had done in what...30 years...was bounce a soft ass mavs team in the first round...
He is the person who set the tone for that team not being horrible...he is the one who said we not going to lose...
Mark Jackson inherited a team that couldn't win 37 games for 3 straight years...couldn't win 30 games in back to back years...
He inherited a steph curry who had ankles problems so bad he was barely hanging on as a starting point guard...or do you have another explanation for the contract golden state was able to give him:usurematteroffact:
I don't even see how you can give steve kerr credit for doing anything with this team...they haven't lost a game since he stopped being on the sideline
Does anybody really think steve kerr could have inherited a 36 and 46 team who's point guard was missing every other game due to an ankle injury and turned them into a championship team
Am I the only one who remembers this guy as a GM in Phoenix...I could have sworn the 7 seconds or less era pretty much died when he traded marion for shaq...
Yeah, but there's a reason 1 roster was more appealing than the other.
And it damn sure wasn't Kerr's genius that built it.
Yeah, it was Don Nelson!
WOAT poster.Another cac exposal thread
Anybody who doesn't understand what mark jackson did for this team is a fukking idiot...
When he took over this team they were the laughing stock of the nba...the only relevant thing they had done in what...30 years...was bounce a soft ass mavs team in the first round...
He is the person who set the tone for that team not being horrible...he is the one who said we not going to lose...
Mark Jackson inherited a team that couldn't win 37 games for 3 straight years...couldn't win 30 games in back to back years...
He inherited a steph curry who had ankles problems so bad he was barely hanging on as a starting point guard...or do you have another explanation for the contract golden state was able to give him:usurematteroffact:
I don't even see how you can give steve kerr credit for doing anything with this team...they haven't lost a game since he stopped being on the sideline
Does anybody really think steve kerr could have inherited a 36 and 46 team who's point guard was missing every other game due to an ankle injury and turned them into a championship team
Am I the only one who remembers this guy as a GM in Phoenix...I could have sworn the 7 seconds or less era pretty much died when he traded marion for shaq...
So Kerr decided to take a better roster that was built up by Jackson.
Kerr and Fisher were both heavily mentored by Jackson.
Why is 1 a genius but one isn't?
Imma let you beat around that bush tho
Who said anything bad about Fisher?
