Stephen Curry thinks the moon landing is fake

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
71,896
Reputation
11,600
Daps
242,149
Bro please, you said vaccines are targeted genocide against black people but blacks are vaccinated at a lower rate than whites. Does that mean the whites are trying to genocide themselves.
Read up on the revolutionary leader Thomas sankara who was a communist vaccinated 80% of his population in assuming office. Was he trying to genocide his populations too or trying to decrease the mortality rate.
Plus, we were vaccinating ourselves before coming enslaved in the US. It was an enslaved black man who saved Boston using a vaccination process long known in Africa.
How an African slave helped Boston fight smallpox - The Boston Globe
 

The Connoisseurs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
6,183
Reputation
1,034
Daps
22,258
...and we knew how to make nuclear weapons before we could make a playstation....

what the hell do those two things have to do with each other?

1st a nuclear was thought of before a gaming console ...

So kick moon rocks with that


2nd it was a response to that likko video yezeeit
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,127
Reppin
the ether
1st a nuclear was thought of before a gaming console ...

So kick moon rocks with that
Come on man. No one could even conceive of a nuclear bomb until 1933 and really not until 1939, yet it was built by 1945.

People were already coming up with computer games by the 1940s and yet it took fifty years before they got to the level of a Playstation.


A playstation is FAR more technically complex than the nuclear bomb. I could explain the physics behind a nuclear bomb in about 60 seconds. It would take forever for me to explain everything that goes into creating a Playstation, from the image production technology to the hardware to the software.


Similarly, the average modern movie is far more complex that the moon landing. All the computing technology necessary for a moon landing can be down with a pocket calculator. While film special effects that take enormous numbers of computers months to render. Even the basic-ass fake looking CGI in Tron took a computer with 2Mb of memory a good six hours to render each frame, and the computer wasn't powerful enough to show an entire frame on screen (even the Cray supercomputers of the time weren't). And that was 1982, what the hell were they gonna do in 1959?
 

Ya Sinning Mane

Superstar
Joined
Feb 27, 2017
Messages
15,123
Reputation
6,660
Daps
52,055


Don't tell me you don't believe in missiles? Don't believe in rockets? Don't believe in satellites? Do you seriously believe all those are fake too? How the hell do you think your GPS works? If you believe in satellites in space, then you HAVE to believe that we can get heavy-ass metal up there.

And breh, it takes 2 days to get to the moon, it takes 6 months to get to Mars, those are VERY different things. And when I was in college one of my assignments was to calculate the ideal leaving and return times for a Mars mission, it has to be chosen perfectly because both of them are rotating around the sun at different speeds and you have to leave at the exact right time to minimize the trip. The shortest realistic Mars mission would be to take off and take 6 months to get there, remain there for 9 months, and then take 6 months to get back. You can't stay for a shorter time cause you'll be on the wrong side of the sun from the Earth. So minimum, it would take TWENTY-ONE months for the shortest possible manned Mars mission. Transporting all the life support (oxygen, water, food, etc.) for a 21-month mission across hundreds of millions of miles is a huge undertaking. We could technically do it, but it's not easy and it's not taken lightly. Not to mention the psychological effects from being stuck with the same 4-5 people for 21 months in a tiny metal can with no other people or space or anything whatsoever.
u got me breh:whoa:

i change my position on this issue.the moon landing real

thanks for correction.
i jus dismissed the whole idea.and didnt know about the preperation.
 

Maschine_Man

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
14,526
Reputation
-5,595
Daps
16,078
Be mad hoe nikka.
Mad at what?

Anyone that blindly wants to accept the word of the government are the fools here not me.

Fool me once... shame on me
Fool me twice??


How many times do you guys need to be fooled before you start questioning what you are being told?
 

The Connoisseurs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
6,183
Reputation
1,034
Daps
22,258
Come on man. No one could even conceive of a nuclear bomb until 1933 and really not until 1939, yet it was built by 1945.

People were already coming up with computer games by the 1940s and yet it took fifty years before they got to the level of a Playstation.


A playstation is FAR more technically complex than the nuclear bomb. I could explain the physics behind a nuclear bomb in about 60 seconds. It would take forever for me to explain everything that goes into creating a Playstation, from the image production technology to the hardware to the software.


Similarly, the average modern movie is far more complex that the moon landing. All the computing technology necessary for a moon landing can be down with a pocket calculator. While film special effects that take enormous numbers of computers months to render. Even the basic-ass fake looking CGI in Tron took a computer with 2Mb of memory a good six hours to render each frame, and the computer wasn't powerful enough to show an entire frame on screen (even the Cray supercomputers of the time weren't). And that was 1982, what the hell were they gonna do in 1959?


That’s cool and all but the human being and what we can do is more complex than anything on earth that was ever created by men our blood has more information than anything on earth. We trump anything that we created or thought of. These inventions are just a matter of time , trial and error.

:yeshrug:
 
Top