Stephen Hawking comes out: ‘I’m an atheist’ because science is ‘more convincing’ than God

[Blackking]

You can be both.

Lol, I only see ideas like this on sites like this...

We can't admit that hes just to ignorant to be agnostic. On another note, if I had his life I'd also fight against a belief in God.

 

[Blackking]

I prefer it when you tell me
should you ask and answer your own question? no lol
Don't tell me how to feel

nope you don't believe that god does not exist but you are in every thread about that

that's sad


I'm great

Lol @ ...

You Dont believe that God does Not exist...

Due to the nature of the word exist... you're not making sense. God either exist, doesn't, or we don't know. You can't prove he doesn't.... and at the same time don't believe he does... so why discuss??

I'd never enter a thread about unicorns made of ice.

 

[noon]

Lol, I only see ideas like this on sites like this...

Well then you need to visit more sites.

 

[Everythingg]

Where is your proof?

Here's one example. Israel exists again doesnt it? What other idol can you point to that has something of that magnitude to corroborate itself?

Why couldn't there be multiple God's or infinite Gods? Prove why that is impossible or erroneous.

I already told you about "could bes". I "could have been" female. I "could have been" white. I "could have been" 6'6. I mean I can go on and on with the "could bes". But I cant explain WHY it didnt happen that way. Its just the way it is.

You said there is only the God of Abraham. I'm giving you an example of a religious concept that directly contradicts your claim. Now prove it wrong as you said you would.

No. I said only the God of Abraham is God. `

 

[Everythingg]

Yes, the burden of proof is on the claimant.

I wonder why getting that answer was like pulling teeth lol

 

[noon]

I wonder why getting that answer was like pulling teeth lol

Now you know what it's like to debate a theist.

Edit: And I bet you still don't understand the burden of proof and who it falls to huh?

 

[Everythingg]

Now you know what it's like to debate a theist.

Already did....

And your edit gets thrown to the bushes

 

[noon]

Already did....

And your edit gets thrown to the bushes

So you… don't understand. But you still assume you do.

 

[Everythingg]

For a second time,that is not the question. I just want to know if the burden of proof would be on the atheist that says "God does not exist"since they are making a claim. Im not asking you what you would say to them or how you would handle this person.

Yes, the burden of proof is on the claimant.

I understand this loud and clear lol

 

[noon]

I understand this loud and clear lol

I can tell that you don't (want to). But whatever.

 

[Everythingg]

I can tell that you don't (want to). But whatever.

And when I ask for this from you, this will be useful information. Till then,

 

[Type Username Here]

Here's one example. Israel exists again doesnt it? What other idol can you point to that has something of that magnitude to corroborate itself?



I already told you about "could bes". I "could have been" female. I "could have been" white. I "could have been" 6'6. I mean I can go on and on with the "could bes". But I cant explain WHY it didnt happen that way. Its just the way it is.



No. I said only the God of Abraham is God. `

Still waiting breh.

 

[Blackking]

Lol.. I think somebody.. the poster boletiate I think.... put a quote of mine in his sig about Hawking...

Its shyt like this that makes him an idiot with some of his statements.

What is science more convincing than God about... ?
Science doesn't disprove God.
Science doesn't contradict God.
Most people who sparked nearly every single discipline of science believed in God.
Some of our greatest believed in God.
Science doesn't show a creator is impossible,... as a matter of fact the things that science doesn't show proves the existence of a creator to knowledgeable people. Science fails to show how consciousness could be produced by random inanimate matter.
A creator is More Convincing because we have seen intelligent forces produce intelligence.
We see how organisms evolved from single cells... we see patterns within all of the universe.

Sure God didn't leave a mixtape from billions of years ago detailing everything... but nothing in science even hints at inanimate matter being able to produce cells. Science isn't more convincing.... hes probably an atheist because he has one of the most fukked up physical situations in the history of mankind

 

[tmonster]

Lol @ ...

You Dont believe that God does Not exist...

Due to the nature of the word exist... you're not making sense. God either exist, doesn't, or we don't know. You can't prove he doesn't.... and at the same time don't believe he does... so why discuss??

I'd never enter a thread about unicorns made of ice.

your loss that was a fire thread

 

[the cac mamba]

If science was more convincing, why isn't he out of the chair he is in? .

i guess prayer didnt work either