the bossman
Superstar
ICE Agent:Cats gonna have to start carrying a copy of their birth certificate on them.
"Looks fake"
You're under arrest for falsifying national documents
Supreme Court just affectively made racial profiling legal to allow Trump's Immigration Raids to continue
- Thread starter dj-method-x
- Start date
"Looks fake"
You're under arrest for falsifying national documents
Since ADOS/FBA is it's own ethnicity, this will only affect tethers, because ADOS/FBA won't be racially profiledI know the coli hates immigrants but these seems like a slippery slope that will surely soon be weaponized against black folks. Now it's "we need to be able to racially profile to curb immigration", next it's "we need to be able to racially profile to curb crime".
Supreme Court lifts limits on LA immigration raids
US top court says that immigration agents can stop people based solely on their race, language or job.www.bbc.com
The US Supreme Court has ruled sweeping immigration raids in Los Angeles can continue for now, lifting a federal judge's order that had barred agents from making stops without "reasonable suspicion".
The Monday ruling is a win for President Donald Trump, who has vowed to conduct record-level deportations of migrants in the country illegally.
The 6-3 decision of the conservative-majority court allows agents to stops suspects based solely on their race, language or job, while a legal challenge to the recent immigration sweeps in LA works its way through the courts.
The liberal justices dissented, saying the decision puts constitutional freedoms at risk.
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in Monday's decision that the lower court's restraining order went too far in restricting how Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents could carry out stops or questioning of suspected unlawful migrants.
"To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion," he wrote. "However, it can be a 'relevant factor' when considered along with other salient factors."
Trump's mass deportation drive collides with city of immigrants
Farm workers fearing deportation stay in California's shadows
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices issued a strong dissent penned by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who wrote that "countless people in the Los Angeles area have been grabbed, thrown to the ground, and handcuffed simply because of their looks, their accents, and the fact they make a living by doing manual labour".
"Today, the Court needlessly subjects countless more to these exact same indignities," she wrote.
The White House welcomed the ruling, vowing in a statement to "continue fulfilling its mandate to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens".
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom, both Democrats, criticised the decision.
"Today's ruling is not only dangerous - it's un-American and threatens the fabric of personal freedom in the United States of America," Bass said in a statement.
Newsom warned that "Trump's private police force now has a green light to come after your family".
Watch: 'We're emotional and disappointed', says plaintiff on Supreme Court ruling
The decision lifts an order by US District Judge Maame E Frimpong in Los Angeles, who had said that there is a "mountain of evidence" showing the raids were violating the US Constitution.
The order halted the raids, with Judge Frimpon saying the Trump administration cannot rely on factors like "apparent race or ethnicity" or "speaking Spanish" alone to stop or question individuals.
The judge also barred immigration enforcement agents from conducting stops based solely on someone's presence "at a particular location" like a bus stop, agricultural site or car wash, or based solely on the type of work an individual does.
The temporary restraining order was issued in a legal challenge by immigration advocacy groups, who argued that immigration officers in Los Angeles were conducting "roving patrols" indiscriminately, and were denying individuals access to lawyers.
Judge Frimpong said this may violate the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable government searches and seizures.
The Supreme Court, however, said that the administration's actions have a good chance of ultimately being considered constitutional by the federal courts. While its decision only pertained to Judge Frimpong's temporary restraining order, the justices also showed how the court would approach the lawsuit should it have to consider an appeal down the road.
Lawyers for the Department of Homeland Security have argued that immigration officers are targeting people based on their legal status in the US, not skin colour, race or ethnicity.
They have also said that Judge Frimpong's order wrongly restricted ICE operations.
Those behind the lawsuit challenging the raids said they were "truly disgusted" with the Supreme Court's decision.
"I didn't think this would be possible," Brian Gavidia, an American citizen who was briefly detained by federal agents in June, told the BBC.
"I thought we had laws here about racial profiling."
Armando Gudino, a plaintiff in the case, raised possible national implications of the ruling.
Mr Gudino, the executive director of the Los Angeles Worker Center Network, a worker and immigrant rights advocacy group, said everyone in the US should be worried, arguing the court had "legalised racism".
The Trump administration began sweeping immigration raids in Los Angeles in June, stopping and arresting people at Home Depot and other workplaces, and were met with immediate protests and civil unrest..
Trump then deployed nearly 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines in response, without authorisation from the state of California.
A federal judge has since ruled that the National Guard deployment was illegal. The White House responded that "a rogue judge is trying to usurp" the president's authority "to protect American cities from violence and destruction."
The Supreme Court's decision to let the raids continue comes as the Trump administration looks to ramp up law enforcement in other cities, including Washington DC.
In August, Trump ordered National Guard troops to the American capital to address what he says is high crime in the city, and is also using federal officers to bolster the district's law enforcement.
He is now signalling that this week he will decide if he will also send federal law enforcement and the National Guard to Chicago.
$cam-U-Well_Jack$on
Superstar
Some of y’all dudes are stupid as fukk.
I really question if in the next 3 years he doesn't vote against his own marriage. I need to see if he is that dedicated to his cause can man these people are just going ham. The SCOTUS is corrupt as fukk.
DatBoiHawk
HAWK
Vote to get racially profiled beaner brehs
Belize King
I got concepts of a plan.
Probably laughed as he wrote it.
Allow local police to infringe on people’s ability to go to work everyday with stupid ass reasons Justice Brehs.
I am beginning to wonder how much sense you have. The posters in this thread are talking about how much trouble Black people are in because of racial profiling. That is a silly point of view, because we have always been racially profiled, so the decision doesn't even impact on Black people because they have always used pretext to harass us.
The true losers if you take off your tinted glasses are White people, because now MAGA cops can use any pretense now to stop them too. Some of Trump’s and other Republicans biggest enemies are other White people. All of those trashy cops in that MAGA gang that stormed the Capitol on January 6th were there to hurt other White people. Now the court has eroded more rights of White people so the have cover to do it now.
Last edited:
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
You're extremely dumb if you think white ppl are going to take the biggest Ls from this
You all are dumb if you are not seeing the bigger picture. This is about an erosion of rights to bring people into compliance of an ethno White Supremacist State. Now they can use law enforcement to help carry out that purpose. Y'all are so focused on what ya'll think are going to happen to Black people, that ya'll don't see what is happening to White people. If you are Black then you never had any rights to begin with and we were already fugged up, so they didn't even need to issue a decision for that.
What does any of that have to do with them removing the legal recourse black people had when they are racially profiled? You nikkas are retarded.
This cae doesn't have anything to do with legal recourse and you nikkas are retarded if you thought that Black people had actual legal recourse to stop racial profiling. They are still racially profiling Black people so we never had legal recourse. You pretend to be a lawyer in this forum so go and do some legal research and you will see that racial profiling has never stopped for Black people.
Last edited:
those white folk you work with on a day to day have you frightened.
You are so afraid of feeling uncomfortable that you have to make up a whole reality to keep yourself from crashing out.
What the Hell you writing about mane? I don't be spending no time around White folks like that. I live in the real World of Black folks and I have never known us not to be racially profiled.
Ethnic Vagina Finder
The Great Paper Chaser
I hope ICE agents start getting killed.
AIM for the head not the vest
AIM for the head not the vest
Similar threads
