Suspected terrorist attack in London.

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,750
Reputation
1,459
Daps
31,848
Reppin
Indiana
Blocking Muslims entirely from entering the country may only further radicalize the Muslims that currently live within the country. That won't stop the problem of terrorism it'll exasperate it.

Once it becomes okay to block a specific group of people, it becomes easier to block the next group you don't like, and then start kicking people out because they're different than you. None of it will end up well.

You mean by leaving Iraq the fukk alone in 2003? Yeah Mr. Hindsight that could've help a lot.

The issues of the Middle East and even Al Qaeda/ISIS specifically go back much, much farther than 2003 and Iraq. The US specifically has been intervening in ME affairs since WWII, including overthrowing the democratically elected governments of Syria and Iraq in the 40s/50s. Of course, the formation and support of Israel has always been an issue as well. Spreading out to include "The West" and not just the US, this conflict has been going on for centuries.
 

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
17,068
Reputation
-2,766
Daps
38,052
You mean by leaving Iraq the fukk alone in 2003? Yeah Mr. Hindsight that could've help a lot.
Invading Iraq, doesn't magically allow muslims into Europe. Regardless of how sound/unsound entering Iraq was that's no reason for western society to put themselves through this.
 

MikeyC

The Coli Royal Rumble Champion 2019
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
25,802
Reputation
4,974
Daps
88,681
Reppin
London
Why England (and I guess the west generally) accepts any Muslims at all is beyond me. As far as I can tell, they are more trouble than they're worth. What could they add to English society that makes up for the government spending, social disruption, and the occasional terrorist attack ?

A few reasons, but mainly because of

  1. The destabilizing British involvement in India & the Middle East
  2. British labour shortages after the war
 

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
17,068
Reputation
-2,766
Daps
38,052
A few reasons, but mainly because of

  1. The destabilizing British involvement in India & the Middle East
  2. British labour shortages after the war

I'm not sure why #1 is a reason to let Muslims in to your country.

About #2, that doesn't explain why it had to be Muslims. England is a great country. I'm sure it appeals to other Christian Europeans and Christian Asians. Also, why do "labor shortages" have to result in more immigrants at all? Are countries' populations supposed to grow indefinitely? I thought there were too many people already? Economic growth cannot be the only consideration when leading a country.
 

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,445
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
The divide politically being at an all time high in the world is killing us.

Everything is in extremes and nobody is willing to meet in the middle in fear of giving in to the other side

You have the right who use this as their reasons to get rid of all Muslims then the left has to answer by almost ignoring these attacks or being more worried about islamaphobia then people being killed so they almost act like their is no threat at all and nothing to see here.

Is it too much to ask for just reasonable fukkin thinking instead of straight party lines and have both sides come together to try to figure this sh1t out?

The left is already giving reasonable solutions.

Fix the foreign policy, stop antagonizing the region and overthrowing/undermining governments, stop funding two of the leading terrorist states (Saudi Arabia, Israel). Work to prosecute international terrorists and erode the base of support for terrorism through cooperation and development.
 

MikeyC

The Coli Royal Rumble Champion 2019
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
25,802
Reputation
4,974
Daps
88,681
Reppin
London
I'm not sure why #1 is a reason to let Muslims in to your country.

Many of the people in the regions who were displaced due to British Colonialism were muslim.

About #2, that doesn't explain why it had to be Muslims. England is a great country. I'm sure it appeals to other Christian Europeans and Christian Asians. Also, why do "labor shortages" have to result in more immigrants at all? Are countries' populations supposed to grow indefinitely? I thought there were too many people already? Economic growth cannot be the only consideration when leading a country.

After the war, the British decided to call upon members of the commonwealth to help rebuild the country, and given that a third of the Empire were muslim, it makes sense that there would be a sizeable number of them in Britain.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
21,416
Reputation
6,683
Daps
67,406
Reppin
San Diego
John Kerry is making really good points on Meet The Press, the exact opposite of Theresa May and Trump's hard line approach. All of the western cities hit hardest by terrorism, all have in common large groups of Muslims living in poverty, and a large disconnect between government/society/ and these disenfranchised groups.
 

Althalucian

All Star
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
1,096
Reputation
310
Daps
4,889
I don't know about you guys, but once the UK kicks out all those dirty Muslims, maybe the US will follow suit. And then, having proven the that the US does what it must to keep us safe, I'm thinking we do the same to all those crime prone blacks living here. It just doesn't make sense why we don't have a white Christian country! I mean, what have they really done for us? They are all a backwards people centuries behind us!

Thank Jesus Christ and God that we don't live in some weird society where we believe in strange beings and commit violence to one another. I honestly can't think of the last time a white person has ever committed a crime!
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
48,680
Reputation
7,390
Daps
153,977
Reppin
CookoutGang
I don't know about you guys, but once the UK kicks out all those dirty Muslims, maybe the US will follow suit. And then, having proven the that the US does what it must to keep us safe, I'm thinking we do the same to all those crime prone blacks living here. It just doesn't make sense why we don't have a white Christian country! I mean, what have they really done for us? They are all a backwards people centuries behind us!

Thank Jesus Christ and God that we don't live in some weird society where we believe in strange beings and commit violence to one another. I honestly can't think of the last time a white person has ever committed a crime!
I see what you did there. :pachaha:
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
81,989
Reputation
10,311
Daps
242,067
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
John Kerry is making really good points on Meet The Press, the exact opposite of Theresa May and Trump's hard line approach. All of the western cities hit hardest by terrorism, all have in common large groups of Muslims living in poverty, and a large disconnect between government/society/ and these disenfranchised groups.

Did he also say this?

 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,465
Daps
37,722
I was just agreeing that these dudes aren't targeting random countries, they're targeting the ones involved in fukking their shyt up.

That being said, they're still killing civilians. It is terrorism.

But it also has little to do with me, we have our own terrorists to fight... they happen to be the same people fukking shyt up in the Middle East.

:hubie: all around. Sorry for the loss of life though.
Civilians? No, there are no civilians in war.
 
Top