Dudes roll out the book list quick tho when its time to help the movie 






op·por·tun·ist
/ˌäpərˈt(y)o͞onəst/
noun
1. a person who exploits circumstances to gain immediate advantage rather than being guided by consistent principles or
plans.
How does giving Tariq money to make a film of information that already exists empower us allexcept it doesn't.
Meanwhile you go see the new Spiderman remake every 5 years
Ya'll act funny still when it comes to making content.
Y'all come up with all these "books" and other recommendations y'all ain't even read or watched whenever someone asks you to go-in on a film project
Meanwhile, if he didn't ask you for anything, y'all are quiet as hell on all these book lists
You all are some goddamn frauds
4 successful films deep, ya'll still questioning the brand and his ability to produce content that reverberates throughout the community
This ain't the time to be picking and choosing community economics. This is literally the first step towards community empowerment, and I even have problems with some of his films in ways I've emailed him about....what have YOU done?![]()

I think people are asking with all of this continued success and notoriety, why can't he approach actual producers for this project? I don't think there's anything wrong with crowdfunding, but he could find producers in LA (which could help put out a higher quality product; less cheap photo inserts etc), but, of course, he would have to chop them out.you're broke, we get it.
This is an independent project.
Do you know what that means?
I see why he goes "independent", but I see why one would question why.We've never seen the receipts, even though they were requested.I've paid for every HC film either via ticket, on demand films (for the first 2) or DVD.![]()
because he can.I think people are asking with all of this continued success and notoriety, why can't he approach actual producers for this project? I don't think there's anything wrong with crowdfunding, but he could find producers in LA (which could help put out a higher quality product; less cheap photo inserts etc), but, of course, he would have to chop them out.I see why he goes "independent", but I see why one would question why.
I posted my HC4 DVD.We've never seen the receipts, even though they were requested.
op·por·tun·ist
/ˌäpərˈt(y)o͞onəst/
noun
1. a person who exploits circumstances to gain immediate advantage rather than being guided by consistent principles or
plans.

How does giving Tariq money to make a film of information that already exists empower us all![]()
blew past HC1 fundraiser alreadyweren't you a hillary clinton supporter though?
btw, $22,000 in 24 hours![]()

He crowdfunded ONE movie. Spike has a studio that employs people; it pays itself forward.because he can.
same reason spike crowd funded this movie and ya'll bytched about it.
y'all hate investing in ANYTHING.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2014/08/spike-lee-and-kickstarter
Outside money = Making Compromises to advertisers and media interests.He crowdfunded ONE movie. Spike has a studio that employs people; it pays itself forward.
It's a great business model for him, because he's literally not losing any money (he is obviously not going to match $200,000 in donations, why would you?). Get the same people who pay for the making of it to buy the movie later. I'm not opposed to the model or even to donating, but you have to admit it gets old. He has access to producers and Hollywood people, he just knows they'll make him break that bread up. Nobody gets a percentage this way.
All this "this is for the family" talk rings a bit hollow when he's the only one making money and the rest of the people only get 2 hours of information they'll probably never watch again. This history is important and necessary, but it could be done through other means.


Oh, that's it. He doesn't want to be beholden to media interests on a topic nobody was interested in in the first place. People would produce it and not give a damn just based off the amount of money they would generate. Nate Parker raised $10 million and showed a violent slave rebellion; you mean to tell me this guy couldn't raise 1/20th of that for some low budget reenactments and interviews? You know better.Outside money = Making Compromises to advertisers and media interests.
Don't be stupid.
Now you're talking about "info they won't watch again"...you mean like 99% of every documentary you've ever seen?
You self-hating c00ns are the worst.![]()
