Tariq Nasheed stans acting like it's a funeral on the Coli

[Dzali OG]

I understand that Tariq came unprepared. This should have been an easy layup for him debating with Racist Cac, but he resorted to repeating the word "White supremacy" and thought that was enough to win the debate

It wasn't a debate though. Ot was a mudsling affair. They wanted to clown him in front of their viewership and he clowned back.

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

So from what I'm gathering, OP is actually agreeing with the arguments presented by the FOX host in the debate that...

• That Tariq's podcasts is the most racist thing he's listened to, while being a representative of FOX News who dedicate their entire program towards criminalizing blacks
• That by reporting racism suffered by blacks at the hands of white that Tariq is inciting racial hatred (that reverse racism bullshyt)
• Claiming that we DO NOT live in a white supremacist country
• Claiming that because America is "multi-ethnic" that racial discrimination no longer exists, especially in regards to whites oppressing blacks
• Lying and claiming that people did not add a racial component to the event, when Tariq proved the contrary as people were on Twitter blaming "BLM" and "Black Muslims"

If a Coli poster made those same arguments they'd be negged to death and quite possibly banned, but because it's Tariq nikkas is out here claiming that he lost the debate, despite the host spewing that white supremacist filth out his mouth?

Is your hatred for Tariq that deeply ingrained that you choose to throw out all logic and co-opt and co-sign white supremacist rhetoric?

 

[Worthless Loser]

There's a huge misconception that if you believe Tariq "lost", then you are automatically aligning with the white guy on Fox and that's really ignorant to suggest. The white guy on Fox didn't win anything. And I wouldn't consider this as Tariq "losing". He just didn't debate his points as strongly as he could have. In one case he backtracked, in another case he didn't answer the question at all and deflected. It wasn't his best performance.

Throwing insults around like "race casino" and calling him a white surpremacist gets him over with the Coli audience who does the same thing on here with this delusional mindset that it means they have the upper hand in an argument, but it doesn't make you look like you're saying anything of merit in the grand scheme of things especially when you had the opportunity to show that merit but didn't because your answers were sub-par.

 

[BushidoBrown]

I rocks with him but this go round he didnt torch the fox news cac. Id call it a stalemate at best

He usually handles these suckers immaculately on HLN so this is sub par for his standards

the tweet he posted to start this whole thing had some race baiter undertones to it not gonna lie

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

There's a huge misconception that if you believe Tariq "lost", then you are automatically aligning with the white guy on Fox and that's really ignorant to suggest. The white guy on Fox didn't win anything. And I wouldn't consider this as Tariq "losing". He just didn't debate his points as strongly as he could have. In one case he backtracked, in another case he didn't answer the question at all and deflected. It wasn't his best performance.

Throwing insults around like "race casino" and calling him a white surpremacist gets him over with the Coli audience who does the same thing on here with this delusional mindset that it means they have the upper hand in an argument, but it doesn't make you look like you're saying anything of merit in the grand scheme of things especially when you had the opportunity to show that merit but didn't because your answers were sub-par.

breh that was NOT A DEBATE. If I called you to discuss a topic, and opened up with "Can you explain your cowardly tweet, you bozo?" what would be your response?

fukker Carlton was trolling, and got trolled back. There was no plan whatsoever of it being a debate.

 

[homiedontplaydat]

So from what I'm gathering, OP is actually agreeing with the arguments presented by the FOX host in the debate that...

• That Tariq's podcasts is the most racist thing he's listened to, while being a representative of FOX News who dedicate their entire program towards criminalizing blacks
• That by reporting racism suffered by blacks at the hands of white that Tariq is inciting racial hatred (that reverse racism bullshyt)
• Claiming that we DO NOT live in a white supremacist country
• Claiming that because America is "multi-ethnic" that racial discrimination no longer exists, especially in regards to whites oppressing blacks
• Lying and claiming that people did not add a racial component to the event, when Tariq proved the contrary as people were on Twitter blaming "BLM" and "Black Muslims"

If a Coli poster made those same arguments they'd be negged to death and quite possibly banned, but because it's Tariq nikkas is out here claiming that he lost the debate, despite the host spewing that white supremacist filth out his mouth?

Is your hatred for Tariq that deeply ingrained that you choose to throw out all logic and co-opt and co-sign white supremacist rhetoric?

 

[UpAndComing]

It wasn't a debate though. Ot was a mudsling affair. They wanted to clown him in front of their viewership and he clowned back.

It was a debate. And the interview he did couple months ago on a news network (forgot what it was), he slaughtered them and came with facts. In this one he didn't. I know he can do better than that. I listen to his show from time to time. It's just hilarious that Tariq stans are for him in this interview, like he's some prophet or something, like they think one bad debate that he lost is the end of the world

 

[WhereIsTheLove]

I find it a little weird when clowns take pleasure in black men who are looking for the best interest of black people, getting trolled by white supremacists.

bunch of c00ns and whiteboys are turning tlr to shyt

OP not black. Look how white people stay on code even after all the deception.

 

[Y2Dre]

So he had one bad showing out of dozens and dozens of mainstream interviews.

Y'all acting like the sky is falling.

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

OP not black. Look how white people stay on code even after all the deception.

that's what I thought...fukkin CAC

 

[Worthless Loser]

breh that was NOT A DEBATE. If I called you to discuss a topic, and opened up with "Can you explain your cowardly tweet, you bozo?" what would be your response?

fukker Carlton was trolling, and got trolled back. There was no plan whatsoever of it being a debate.

So you're saying it's ok to stoop to his level?

 

[@OffHalsted]

lol so you agree with fukker carlton the white supremacist? you sambos always out yourself

I don't have to agree with somebodies views to understand the argument

For example It can be a argument on homosexuality & beastiuality, which lifestyle is better. I don't agree with the views of that lifestyle but I can understand how somebody will win the argument based on performance & getting their point across

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

So you're saying it's ok to stoop to his level?

on fox news....ABSOLUTELY. no non-c00ning black man gets to actually debate on fox news. Look at Keith Ellison and DL Hughley's interviews, and Keith Ellison is an elected official. You know damn well Tariq, an internet blogger to these CACs, were going to treat him worse. Even if he made a good point, it would have been cut off or talked over. So Tariq had to stoop to the lowest levels of fox scum. Get over it.

 

[151_Pr00f]

I disagree with tariq on alot of things but in this case the host took his tweet out of context and tried to run with that naraitive and tariq wasnt having it.

Tariqs quote was pointing out the fact that racists on twitter were racialising the incident in a way that would somehow inplicate the involvement of BLM. It was vague enough to add a spin to it which is what the anchor tried to do in that debate.

 

[↓R↑LYB]

Yes indeed :tariq: