Tariq Nasheed stans acting like it's a funeral on the Coli

[All Knowledge]

Anybody bothered by this is just afraid of facing white supremacy head on

Tariq Nasheed being on Fox News had some y'all shaking in your seats nervous with fear


Shook ones indeed

 

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

the problem was he got him started from the beginning; calling him a coward. that's how i know tariq isn't built for this type of discussion, caught him off guard and he lost control of the conversation from the first 10 seconds. rule #4: keep composure, soldier and you'll ball before it's all over...

 

[Worthless Loser]

on fox news....ABSOLUTELY. no non-c00ning black man gets to actually debate on fox news. Look at Keith Ellison and DL Hughley's interviews, and Keith Ellison is an elected official. You know damn well Tariq, an internet blogger to these CACs, were going to treat him worse. Even if he made a good point, it would have been cut off or talked over. So Tariq had to stoop to the lowest levels of fox scum. Get over it.

So somehow, because he stoops to their level, they look silly for trolling but he doesn't simply because he's giving it back to them?

 

[@OffHalsted]

on fox news....ABSOLUTELY. no non-c00ning black man gets to actually debate on fox news. Look at Keith Ellison and DL Hughley's interviews, and Keith Ellison is an elected official. You know damn well Tariq, an internet blogger to these CACs, were going to treat him worse. Even if he made a good point, it would have been cut off or talked over. So Tariq had to stoop to the lowest levels of fox scum. Get over it.

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

find a video that isn't 20 years old, c00n. fox news wasn't even fox news back then. it was more like CNN before they started pandering to conservative whites and black sambos like yourself

 

[WheatThins]

breh that was NOT A DEBATE. If I called you to discuss a topic, and opened up with "Can you explain your cowardly tweet, you bozo?" what would be your response?

i would garner that you are very emotional for name calling and that your argument has no true basis, hence your focus on pathos. from there i would be even more emboldened as too how a feel about you, and respond with ethos (confidence in my beliefs) and logos (evidence that backs up my beliefs)

these 3 principals are the core of debate/argument. both people here played into pathos. and when you try to play a fools game...

 

[Free White & 21]

So from what I'm gathering, OP is actually agreeing with the arguments presented by the FOX host in the debate that...

• That Tariq's podcasts is the most racist thing he's listened to, while being a representative of FOX News who dedicate their entire program towards criminalizing blacks
• That by reporting racism suffered by blacks at the hands of white that Tariq is inciting racial hatred (that reverse racism bullshyt)
• Claiming that we DO NOT live in a white supremacist country
• Claiming that because America is "multi-ethnic" that racial discrimination no longer exists, especially in regards to whites oppressing blacks
• Lying and claiming that people did not add a racial component to the event, when Tariq proved the contrary as people were on Twitter blaming "BLM" and "Black Muslims"

If a Coli poster made those same arguments they'd be negged to death and quite possibly banned, but because it's Tariq nikkas is out here claiming that he lost the debate, despite the host spewing that white supremacist filth out his mouth?

Is your hatred for Tariq that deeply ingrained that you choose to throw out all logic and co-opt and co-sign white supremacist rhetoric?

Nobody can explain how tucker won, nobody will even attempt to. The white supremacist trolls aren't even trying to.

Tariq SEEMED a little impatient and agitated but after you factor in the time delay of the feed, along with the hostility of the host, you'd have to excuse SOME of that. That time delay makes you look crazy as hell in lively debate

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

i would garner that you are very emotional for name calling and that your argument has no true basis, hence your focus on pathos. from there i would be even more emboldened as too how a feel about you, and respond with ethos (confidence in my beliefs) and logos (evidence that backs up my beliefs)

these 3 principals are the core of debate/argument. both people here played into pathos. and when you try to play a fools game...

and then your mic would get shut off, followed by a "thanks for coming on, now to the next segment"

 

[@OffHalsted]

find a video that isn't 20 years old, c00n. fox news wasn't even fox news back then. it was more like CNN before they started pandering to conservative whites and black sambos like yourself

when did fox news become fox news?

 

[WheatThins]

and then your mic would get shut off, followed by a "thanks for coming on, now to the next segment"

ok. but at least I got the truth out. my goal wouldn't be to chop it up with racists as long as possible. it would be to tell the truth. 1 minute of truth > 3 minutes of trivalty

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

ok. but at least I got the truth out. my goal wouldn't be to chop it up with racists as long as possible. it would be to tell the truth. 1 minute of truth > 3 minutes of trivalty

ok well, next time fox news asks for your opinion, you can show us how it's done

 

[Regine Hunter]

the astronomical level in which some brehs on this forum suck this nikka dikk is
like damn...let peanut have some too. He'll take some L's every now and then.

 

[Fatboi1]

So from what I'm gathering, OP is actually agreeing with the arguments presented by the FOX host in the debate that...

• That Tariq's podcasts is the most racist thing he's listened to, while being a representative of FOX News who dedicate their entire program towards criminalizing blacks
• That by reporting racism suffered by blacks at the hands of white that Tariq is inciting racial hatred (that reverse racism bullshyt)
• Claiming that we DO NOT live in a white supremacist country
• Claiming that because America is "multi-ethnic" that racial discrimination no longer exists, especially in regards to whites oppressing blacks
• Lying and claiming that people did not add a racial component to the event, when Tariq proved the contrary as people were on Twitter blaming "BLM" and "Black Muslims"

If a Coli poster made those same arguments they'd be negged to death and quite possibly banned, but because it's Tariq nikkas is out here claiming that he lost the debate, despite the host spewing that white supremacist filth out his mouth?

Is your hatred for Tariq that deeply ingrained that you choose to throw out all logic and co-opt and co-sign white supremacist rhetoric?

but but but he didn't elucidate his points eloquently when he had the chance! Tucker gave him a chance and wasn't being rude/badgering him said cacs/c00ns.

 

[WheatThins]

ok well, next time fox news asks for your opinion, you can show us how it's done

for sure. i hope they do one day. id hold it down for all of us and deliver the truth mic drop if they tried to get with the shyts.

maybe tariq can consult with some professional black debaters/lawyers and see what tips they can give him on the philosophy of argument and appeal

edit: tbh prob would never go on fox regardless of the paycheck or publicity. like i said, play stupid games..

 

[homiedontplaydat]

And notice how they are calling Tariq a Black Lives Matter advocate when he has no ties to black lives matter as an organization. Cacs are the slickest with it, they don't know how to play fair all they care about is winning.