Breh, I can't judge off of that. Then my analysis will seem wacky because these guys can perform a lot differently for the Raiders than they could for the Texans. I just judge the players.I feel ya breh, but I am basing it on the Texans as a team. Texans do not have 2-14 talent which is what makes the team a very different #1 pick. They have a good OL and solid running game. They have impact players on defense and would have been better with an additional pass rusher and a healthy Cushing. Hundley would be a lot higher risk on a bad team like the Jaguars. But on a Texans team with Johnson, Foster, Daniels and the OLine he could sustain drives with his feet. He can develop into a good QB while relying on pro bowlers to make plays. He is just not as polished as Teddy, but neither was Kaep coming out of Nevada. Manziel is exciting but he takes on defenders to much and that can lead to injuries at the next level with harder hitting players. I think the biggest question mark for him is his playing style in relation to his build/size. Teams want players that are available every Sunday.
With that said, I am really not sure about how teams will value these QB's for now. It does seem like the O'Brien hire means is highly likely Teddy is the pick by his offensive system and what he requires from a QB. It seems like Manizel is a lock for Cleveland at the least. I can see Jacksonville being all over the place but I think David Carr or A.J. McCarron will be their pick if I had to choose today. Hundley is a wildcard because he's raw but extremely talented but he's more raw than Geno or E.J. but he's more talented than them too. It's too early for us to truly talk about it cause senior bowl hasn't started and the interviews haven't came yet.
Hundley is more raw right now than Kaep, Hundley just is more talented and younger. I see your points though, where they land is vital but for now, I have no clue and guessing just doesn't work in scouting.


