The '96 Bulls lost 2 of their last 4 home games

Liquid

Superstar
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
37,121
Reputation
2,665
Daps
59,923
:mjlol: the competition was dramatically weaker in the 90's and defense now is much more taxing. Allowing zone causes so much more movement. This removes so much isolation and forces everyone to moving on both ends of the court. If anything that'll cause guys to wear out faster in today's league.
Breh you can't even touch up a player without getting a flagrant these days. All the hits cats like Mason and Oakley would have put on Thompson and Curry would not affect them? You guys are delusional man and I've come to accept how great this warriors team is, but even if they match the win record it's not as impressive to me as to what the bulls did.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,320
Reputation
6,499
Daps
174,592
Seriously I don't think you guys give enough credit to what that 72-10 record really meant in the 90s. Even if the Warriors get to 72, it is not the same 72 that Chicago had to win. I am not even talking about talent because the Warriors are a stacked team, but the play style?

You think the Warriors are getting tired? shyt man, if that was the case they would have been EXHAUSTED by game 60 with the old grind out style. You think the Knicks, Heat, Magic and the rest of the squads back in the day weren't doing everything they could to wear down Pippen and Jordan?

That Draymond excuse of being bored is BS
The talent level was so diluted in 1995-1996 that it renders everything you are attempting to say here as moot.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,557
Reputation
10,029
Daps
111,091
Reppin
Brooklyn
Breh you can't even touch up a player without getting a flagrant these days. All the hits cats like Mason and Oakley would have put on Thompson and Curry would not affect them? You guys are delusional man and I've come to accept how great this warriors team is, but even if they match the win record it's not as impressive to me as to what the bulls did.
"Handchecking :skip:"

That's your argument? Propping designated goons on a team whose offense was always in the bottom tier in the league and never won shyt? You gonna try to argue how they would cook and take the Warriors to school with mid range jumpers too :skip:? The Knicks comprised less than 5% of the Bulls schedule that year anyway.
 

Illuminatos

#OVOXO
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
45,691
Reputation
2,938
Daps
191,899
Reppin
NULL
Breh you can't even touch up a player without getting a flagrant these days. All the hits cats like Mason and Oakley would have put on Thompson and Curry would not affect them? You guys are delusional man and I've come to accept how great this warriors team is, but even if they match the win record it's not as impressive to me as to what the bulls did.

Breh, Klay Thompson is 6'7" and Steph is bench pressing 400 pounds. These dudes aren't some weak little kids. :mjlol:

And like someone said earlier, the Bulls played in a weak, watered down league with 6 expansion teams.:wtf:

:DKYuLyin:

I am NOT A Warriors fan, I've told you this like 3 times already. :camby:
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,874
Reputation
7,320
Daps
183,764
Breh, Klay Thompson is 6'7" and Steph is bench pressing 400 pounds. These dudes aren't some weak little kids. :mjlol:

And like someone said earlier, the Bulls played in a weak, watered down league with 6 expansion teams.:wtf:



I am NOT A Warriors fan, I've told you this like 3 times already. :camby:

6 expansion teams? :dahell:
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,557
Reputation
10,029
Daps
111,091
Reppin
Brooklyn
Why would we be counting teams from the 80s on that list? :mjlol:
Their first season in the league was 1988-1989. It's right there just a year before the decade started and most expansion teams take ages to get shyt right. Minnesota took Rick Mahon in the expansion draft as if you could build around a guy who played 21 minutes a night and just set screens and grabbed rebounds. Minnesota has always been terrible, Miami was mediocre as best until 1995-96, Charlotte was only good from 1992-93 until 1994-95, Orlando was bad until 1992-93, the Grizzlies were so bad that 6 years into their existence they were moving to Memphis, and the raptors have won just a single playoff series ever, and only now had their first 50 win season as a franchise.
 

Broad Street Bully

Sick & Tide Sixers/Phillies/Cowboys fan smh
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
21,631
Reputation
6,010
Daps
90,485
Reppin
Philly. Fucc a Eagle. I mean dat.
Seriously I don't think you guys give enough credit to what that 72-10 record really meant in the 90s. Even if the Warriors get to 72, it is not the same 72that Chicago had to win. I am not even talking about talent because the Warriors are a stacked team, but the play style?

You think the Warriors are getting tired? shyt man, if that was the case they would have been EXHAUSTED by game 60 with the old grind out style. You think the Knicks, Heat, Magic and the rest of the squads back in the day weren't doing everything they could to wear down Pippen and Jordan?

That Draymond excuse of being bored is BS
Stopped reading here :dead:
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,874
Reputation
7,320
Daps
183,764
Their first season in the league was 1988-1989. It's right there just a year before the decade started and most expansion teams take ages to get shyt right. Minnesota took Rick Mahon in the expansion draft as if you could build around a guy who played 21 minutes a night and just set screens and grabbed rebounds. Minnesota has always been terrible, Miami was mediocre as best until 1995-96, Charlotte was only good from 1992-93 until 1994-95, Orlando was bad until 1992-93, the Grizzlies were so bad that 6 years into their existence they were moving to Memphis, and the raptors have won just a single playoff series ever, and only now had their first 50 win season as a franchise.

OK, that didn't answer my question

It makes no sense to group Miami, Orlando, Charlotte with two newly established expansion teams in 95

Those three teams all had very competent rosters by then

Just being purposely obtuse for no reason acting like there were 6 expansion teams in 95-95
 
Top