The British Were KICKING The Americans ASS When It Came To Rock Music In The 60's (You Agree?)

Do You Agree That The British Were Better In The 60's?


  • Total voters
    37

SirReginald

The African Diaspora Will Be "ONE" (#PanAfricana)
Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
51,731
Reputation
155
Daps
79,388
Reppin
Pan Africanism
Before Hendrix there was Motown. There was never a point where the brits were outdoing Americans, as long as African Americans were around.
The British were outdoing White American artists (maybe besides Bob Dylan). However, AA's had the British beat, but I will say that the British were better than the Cac American artists.
 

Hoodoo Child

The Urban Legend
Joined
Jul 22, 2017
Messages
22,698
Reputation
9,711
Daps
94,252
Reppin
The Crossroads
you mean Elvis
full
 

The Odum of Ala Igbo

Hail Biafra!
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
17,969
Reputation
2,945
Daps
52,735
Reppin
The Republic of Biafra
[Last Thread Of The Week From Me]

I gotta call a spade a spade, when Britain's artists starting the British Invasion in the U.S. during the 60's the had us beat. Even though I make fun of the British a lot they were putting in work heavy. Man, bands like The Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, The Beatles, and others a like took over the world. I will say the only ones from the U.S. who out did the Stones for a short time were Grand Funk Railroad. Other than that and some Southern Rock those bands had NOTHING on the British. I will say that the U.S. made a turn around in the 70's though.

I will say that you had the Monkees, but they were a flash in the pan. The Doors were cool though. Besides the British, Black music at that time was magnificent.

You agree?

Confining your question to solely rock music, I still think that British rock musicians pushed the envelope of the genre better than American groups such as the Beach Boys. Regarding African-American rock and roll musicians who were still around, like Bo Diddley, Little Richard, Chuck Berry - their unique artistic contribution were no longer pushing the envelope by 1965 although they could gain occasional hits on the charts.

Then Hendrix changed the game...
 

Cynic

Superstar
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
16,236
Reputation
2,312
Daps
35,094
Reppin
NULL
Yes. Those 60s British bands were complete wiggers but they had genuine love for AA music.

:mjlol:
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
56,159
Reputation
15,473
Daps
208,275
Reppin
Above the fray.
Now, The Isely Brothers are a group that covered a lot of genres of music
Not sure how this song was categorized then or now but here is the original version





Here is the Beatles cover from a few years later, and I guess it goes under "rock"

 
Last edited:

OrionBC

Hard Work and Cloud Watching
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
642
Reputation
215
Daps
3,159
Music is subjective I think both America and Britian were doing great musically during this time. Britian may have had The Beatles, Zepplin, Pink Floyd, and Rolling Stones but, America had bands like Sly and the Family Stone, The Doors, and Velvet Underground going at the same time. Music at that time was all a gift:blessed:
 

SirReginald

The African Diaspora Will Be "ONE" (#PanAfricana)
Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
51,731
Reputation
155
Daps
79,388
Reppin
Pan Africanism
Music is subjective I think both America and Britian were doing great musically during this time. Britian may have had The Beatles, Zepplin, Pink Floyd, and Rolling Stones but, America had bands like Sly and the Family Stone, The Doors, and Velvet Underground going at the same time. Music at that time was all a gift:blessed:
I didn't listen to much Velvet Underground. TBH, I followed Both Lou Reed and Iggy Pop when they went solo. I did listen to some of The Stooges records though.
 
Top