The case against Bernie Sanders

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Because of exploitation,.

Such as?

unequal opportunity gaps on a gross scale,

such as?

and the majority being left out of the economic heaven dream

That would happen regardless.

 

[Bugatti Biceps]

Such as?

nikka. Slavery. Don't be dense.

such as?

Seriously? The racial and gender pay gap been in existence, not to mention racist employment practices.

That would happen regardless.

Probably. There are always people who want shyt but don't want to do shyt for it or refuse to do what it takes to participate in the economic system.

 

[BaggerofTea]

I've been to 56 different countries traveling for NATO as a counterintelligence analyst for both CENTCOM and AFRICOM. I'm betting you don't.

Im a Risk Analysis major, any room for a breh???

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

nikka. Slavery. Don't be dense.

Bernie speaks to issues from 1865? Or 2016? Be specific. Stop engaging low brow arguments.

Seriously? The racial and gender pay gap been in existence, not to mention racist employment practices.

There are already laws in place...you realize this right? The only other option is the government mandating who gets hired where. We're approaching that being the only option.

Probably. There are always people who want shyt but don't want to do shyt for it or refuse to do what it takes to participate in the economic system.

But you call this inequality?

 

[tmonster]

when it comes to subsidizing the oil or pharma industry you sing a different tune though....

what? ..........what? what the hell are you talking about?

 

[tmonster]

why would wages go up with productivity?

They can't, the excess wealth created must be fed to Demon King Bazikula The Eternal
Praise be to Bazikula

 

[tmonster]

That's because @tmonster is a high school liberal with no real understanding or comprehension of the outside world.

Incorrect as always, working on that GED, the man can't control me with his institutions

 

[Robbie3000]

why would wages go up with productivity?

This is a ridiculous question. If people are producing more wealth, it should be shared more broadly. Median wage should go up. The only wages that have kept up with productivity growth are for senior managers and CEOs. I wonder why?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

This is a ridiculous question. If people are producing more wealth, it should be shared more broadly. Median wage should go up. The only wages that have kept up with productivity growth are for senior managers and CEOs. I wonder why?

You said productivity...not wealth.

Big difference.

And wealth predominates in industries that:

1. make money (obviously)
2. Its employees are more skilled and demand more money on account of the assets they bring to the company by way of education or experience.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

They can't, the excess wealth created must be fed to Demon King Bazikula The Eternal
Praise be to Bazikula

Its a serious question.

Its not a de facto assertion I just take because people repeat it....why would wages go up with increased productivity?

 

[Robbie3000]

You said productivity...not wealth.

Big difference.

And wealth predominates in industries that:

1. make money (obviously)
2. Its employees are more skilled and demand more money on account of the assets they bring to the company by way of education or experience.

More productivity = more growth = more wealth. This is not really debatable.

Prior to Reagan revolution, productivity kept up with median wages and not just the highest wages. This is the main reason that has led to inequality. Even Hillary Clinton agrees.

 

[Losttribe]

Lol.

 

[tmonster]

Its a serious question.

it's a serious answer

 

[tmonster]

If people are producing more wealth, it should be shared more broadly.

that just might be crazy enough to work

 

[JahFocus CS]

Let your fear of your political adversaries dictate who you support for the nomination.

Clinton Democrats