Love was a better player than Wiggins in college. His UCLA stats are superior to Wiggins across the board.
Stop worrying about hype and look at the stats breh
Kevin Love is only 25 years old, Kevin Love and Lebron James is a championship nucleus, Those two together could go strong for another 3-5 years. So unless Wiggins is going to be a perennial all star and more importantly be a long term Cav (cause let's face it, who the f*ck wants to live in Cleveland for the long term other than
), you make that trade.
Last edited:


. Averaging 17 as a freshman in the big 12 is no joke. I keep reading "that nikka is trash" and "that nikka showed me nothing in kansas" and " that nikka is a bust". Like wtf did I miss
. People act like the gap from 17 points to 20 is boundless. If Drew averaged 20 points all this overrated talk would be
. I would be willing to bet my full years college tuition money that if wiggins stayed in kansas he'd average at least 22 points this year. I'm confused if it's just lack of bball iq by people or just extreme expectations. I swear I think some nikkas on this board only watch ESPN and didn't actually watch wiggins in high school so when they heard "best prospect since lebron" they legit expected 18 year old lebron to suit up for kansas
. Nikkas must've thought he'd be out here averaging 26-6-8 in college.
To be real if I based my expectations on wiggins coming into the season only on what I heard on ESPN and not my own evaluation of his skills, I'd think he was an overrated bust too
. Good thing I'm smart enough to realize them ESPN cacs are full of sh1t . Told my homie a month before college bball started out of Parker, Wiggins, and randle wiggins would look the worst because his strengths and weaknesses aren't suited for kansas or college bball and he'd average 15-18 ppg. Anyways after this I'm done trying to convince nikkas about wiggins. It's up to his play now
If he and Deng are able to turn the clock back 4 years or so then then I could see but that is a pretty big "if".

Wiggins doesn't have to be an all-time great or better then or even as good as Love. What part of this is confusing?
This isn't NBA Live/2K. Winning is about having team that fits together not just putting as many big names together as possible. When did I say anything about sustained excellence or a dynasty? Right now the Cavs are better off with Wiggins playing D and scoring off of alley-oops and put backs AND depth/flexibility up front than they are pining all their hopes on 2 injury prone guys who don't play defense and Lebron and that's it. You don't pay 3 guys the max AND trade Wiggins for a "chance" breh. They had chances with Bron the first go-round. They will have chances without Love. You only make this deal if it all but guarantees titles and it does not.