
Of course you need it as well. That is a dumb ass comment breh.
no it isnt if you agree you need it as well. you cited needing a good oline to have successful run game, as a reason for RBs being phased out.
when it has nothing to do with the oline
Its about who needs it more. In the event of the defense successfully shooting the B or C gap to rush the QB theres inherently more options for the X, Y or TE than the back most times.
a good RB doesnt need the line as much as a good passing offense. especially if you have a statue as a qb. seattle line is shyt but their run game is great because marshawn breaks a gazillion tackles
also Im not sure why youre lumping these together, a good run blocking line is nothing like a good pass blocking line.
This is using the assumption that the line is needed more for receivers. Obviously no tight end or wr needs anyone to be successful other than the quarterback (so we really are talking QBs) and im saying that you can look at the teams that had horrible pass protection from the line and they still threw significantly more being hurried, or blitz. Take the Bears the past couple years, with that atrocious ass line. Theres a reason that their best skill player before Marshall came was Matt Forte who as their RB, was the leading receiver on the team and it wasnt because of his hands. It was because when the line couldnt hold,
the reason why forte was their best player wasnt because the line couldnt hold. it was because he was literally their best player on offense. jay cutler is an overrated ass qb and their best receiving option was greg fukking olsen. and forte is great at checkdowns