THE DIDDY FEDERAL TRIAL (UPDATE : DIDDY ON THE YARD)

Whats verdict?

  • Guilty

    Votes: 298 61.1%
  • Not Guilty

    Votes: 190 38.9%

  • Total voters
    488

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,250
Reputation
3,646
Daps
107,653
The prosecution is going to have a harder time finding cases to justify the sentence they want. It really only needs to be 2 years total with time served, and the judge letting him know that if he gets caught up again he's going to get the book thrown at him.
They‘re not going to have a hard time. It doesn’t exist. The judge knew he had guidelines and wasn't going to risk his career to coddle the prosecution or the slanted media. Puff has no priors.

This letter is his cop out so the public dont have a backlash against him. It is going to be well, the prosecution couldn’t find a precedent so it is on them. Which is fair because he didn’t bring the case to court to begin with. It was them.
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
65,514
Reputation
10,299
Daps
218,946
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..


Joe Tacopina schooling on what's racketeering and sex trafficking.

He literally said everything I and a few others on here was saying and we were being called stupid and Diddy defenders. Lol. People dead ass let their emotions run their lives with no critical thinking it's wild af.
 

Razzay

Pro
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
2,549
Reputation
-222
Daps
2,339
Reppin
NULL
They‘re not going to have a hard time. It doesn’t exist. The judge knew he had guidelines and wasn't going to risk his career to coddle the prosecution or the slanted media. Puff has no priors.

This letter is his cop out so the public dont have a backlash against him. It is going to be well, the prosecution couldn’t find a precedent so it is on them. Which is fair because he didn’t bring the case to court to begin with. It was them.

The prosecution wont have a precedent to go off. They will try to include prior bad acts or conduct from the trial. However the defense does have a precedent to NOT include prior bad acts or misconduct during trial.

https://go.skimresources.com/?id=41...0d351507238b7b&xjsf=other_click__auxclick [2]

The judge is damaging controlling himself, he has put in the letter that Puff is category 1. Which is sentencing someone with a clean record. The supreme court decision favors the defense. Puff about to walk October 3rd. "Release date bigger than mandelas".



https://x.com/innercitypress/status/1943336860044153028
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,250
Reputation
3,646
Daps
107,653
The prosecution wont have a precedent to go off. They will try to include prior bad acts or conduct from the trial. However the defense does have a precedent to NOT include prior bad acts or misconduct during trial.

https://go.skimresources.com/?id=41214X1067156&isjs=1&jv=15.7.1&sref=https://www.thecoli.com/threads/the-diddy-federal-trial-sentencing-october-8th.1081902/page-476&url=https://x.com/innercitypress/status/1943336860044153028&xs=1&xtz=240&xuuid=055488d3ecda9f00740d351507238b7b&xjsf=other_click__auxclick [2]

The judge is damaging controlling himself, he has put in the letter that Puff is category 1. Which is sentencing someone with a clean record. The supreme court decision favors the defense. Puff about to walk October 3rd. "Release date bigger than mandelas".



https://x.com/innercitypress/status/1943336860044153028

I’m not sure if you know but we agree and you restated what I already wrote.
 
Top