Maybe Brock simply decided to give his friend a W so his son could see him wrestle one time.
Maybe Brock simply decided to give his friend a W so his son could see him wrestle one time.
Goldberg is and always has been terrible![]()
Stop trying to juelz.gif an explanation for the WWE's idioic booking decisions
Dumbest thing they've done since ending the streak. Dumber, actually.
If Brock-Ambrose, Brock-Orton never happened then it wouldn't be so bad, but you've basically booked three straight trash Lesnar matches now, and two straight weird endings. Why would anyone pay to see another Brock match at this point.
I thought he didn't give a fukk about his kids though?Maybe Brock simply decided to give his friend a W so his son could see him wrestle one time.
The fact that so many of you are talking about it and want to see what happens next means whatever they were going for worked. Just like they did with summerslam
I also like the storytelling aspect of this - Brock finally encounters a challenge, another monster on his level that he can't beat and can't beat easily, someone who made him a victim of the same barbarity and dominance he's shown towards others. Brock gets his comeuppance, and it feels satsifying.
Not much to say except that you're wrong. About everything of course, but especially about any faith you have in WWE to "follow this up right."I can sum it up in one sentence for you if you'd like: Brock needs a story changeup, and nobody and nothing really got buried because it doesn't work like that and you know it. Explain to me what was dumb about this, and ending the streak for that matter. Brock ended the streak and as a result became a legit unbeatable monster who's a consistent top draw for the company and attracts eyes and attention every time he's in a ring, how's that dumb. And no, 5 years of buildup weren't thrown away because of tonight, same way 21 years weren't thrown away just cuz Taker finally lost. And no, Brock getting beat by a geezer isn't dumb either, because Taker Triple H Sting and whoever were/are stilled billed as formidable threats in their late 40s and 50s.
Granted WWE has to follow this up right before I can say this was a truly good result, but you're working yourself by saying the decision was stupid. A lot of fans seemed to like it too, the arena popped and there's been positive reactions on the Internet.
Not much to say except that you're wrong. About everything of course, but especially about any faith you have in WWE to "follow this up right."Get a clue
I agree with this, but there is no reason it couldnt be someone else on the roster.
Especially after last night. Don't even bring that buffoon on TV again.
Wrong. For both matches people were complaining about how short and underwhelming the matches were after so much media hype.