Conservative politics for at least the past 30+ years have had rhetoric that seems to suggest that you have more strength or independence by voting for them. They use phrases or words like self-reliance, independent, self-sufficient, "a staunch conservative [blank]," or "a strong Christian [blank]" as if they have a monopoly on the ideas.
I never really thought that it was really a sign of strength to shy away from your community and refuse to help others, particularly when the chips were up for you. When I'm doing well and my buddies are going through financial straits, I don't mind paying for a few rounds on the weekend. I know that the same would work in reverse. I also don't think that indifference to people that are struggling made you a stronger person. Greed is a corrupting force on your mind that inhibits your most basic elements of humanity. Why would anyone be proud to embrace it and masquerade as if it were strength?
Mitt Romney dodged the draft to convert the French to Mormonism, yet has the lack of scruples to call Barack Obama a coward on foreign policy. This alone should let you know what strength really means to these people. Strength doesn't come from within, it comes from accruing an absurd amount of wealth and power and cruelly using it to keep others from doing so, to the point where they suffer and have no way of eking out a decent living for themselves.
I think that strength has more to do with a willingness to not only create a steady and strong life for yourself, but the willingness to help pick someone up when the chips might be down for them. Not only will you possibly need it one day, but goddamn it, man, isn't it more of a manly thing to do to show that you have both power and the conscience to properly use it?
Anyway, that's my random thought. I'll step off my soapbox now.