I do think there is a difference between community and “nation-ness” based on a what the black nationalist of the 60s and 70s speak of.the OP story over simplifies things communities are not nations. When was America going to allow that?
A new nation means war
we live in black communities now but the difference between the two is political and economic power. It’s about “the land changing hands” but not necessarily having your own “state”
we must own homes and businesses and be able to hold elected officials that represent own communities accountable for representing own needs and interests. At that point you cross the line from just having a community to “nation-ness” in the way black nationalist speak of.
imo it doesn’t have to be a separate “state” or about you having your own government/military. It’s able owning the means of production in your community to some degree and having enough solidarity that can be used to govern that community even if it’s somewhat within the confines of the “state” (USA)
the term “nation” is a bit euphemistically used in this context but I think this is what the meaning is in this context. And if we were able to focus in and execute this in the 70/80s, our people would’ve been the better for it.
Last edited: