What's the alternative though? Indefinite lockdowns? People have started to discount every trade-off associated with them. Lost education, lost revenue, mental health impacts etc.
Goverments thankfully stepped in for people who've lost jobs, but I think many people who've adjusted easily because they can work from home (I am as well), discount the impact on people's lives who cannot. Same for impact of no school on kids, or delayed surgeries and appointments on overall health outcomes etc.
If most cases can still be traced, and are focused on younger people, rising cases isn't the end of the world. The key metric is hospitalizations rather than cases IMO.
Obviously, people's lives have been impacted. But I'm not asking for an indefinite lockdown. I'm asking for things not to be done half-assed. That's it. Other countries have shown that it's fine to reopen if things are done with an abundance of caution and opening when numbers are low. Having 100 cases daily is NOT low. Australia temporarily went back to stage 2 when they had 100 cases.
We've had outbreaks because the messaging made it seem this was over once they lifted certain restrictions.
Just because people aren't being hospitalized doesn't mean having covid won't impact their long term health. See: Myocarditis, decreased lung capacity, damage to cognitive functions.
I admit there is an obvious impact that people's lives, but I just want them to be as cautious as possible. My opinion, I don't think they're being cautious when they're allowing weddings, strip club openings, gym openings and these have all resulted in new cases and outbreaks