says a nikka that was chasing a $100k stock…some y’all are priceless
This man has made more threads about crypto and stock plays than anyone else in here. I'm still waiting on a few of his calls to play out.

says a nikka that was chasing a $100k stock…some y’all are priceless
Meh. Questions like that produces nothing of value.
But to answer that question, humans are nothing more than intelligent animals. We have the same predatory instincts and wild mannerisms.
That being the case, in the animal kingdom, there are preys and predators.
When you’re complaining about a job, a boss, a situation that u feel utterly powerless in, which category do u think you fall into?
The good news is, u don’t have to remain a prey.
The problem with this thinking is many men aren't willing to contribute as best they can to the betterment of society which creates a huge free rider problem for those who are. Is it fair that the man willing to work 100hr weeks gets the same result as the one working 40? Is it fair that the man with hgiher ambitions and risk tolerance gets the same result as the extremely complacent one?For in a just society, no man would concern himself with his lack of wealth. A society that cares about its citizens is one in which no man should worry that he may never become a millionaire. A man willing to contribute as best he can, in a society that is equitable, is a man who will never feel the pang of hunger nor the pavement when he lays in his bed.
![]()
Hell is mind state, hate to break it to yaNot even close. Hell is a place people's minds can't comprehend, just like Heaven. Except in Hell all of the evil and terrible things you can experience will be experienced in complete tangible darkness and loneliness.
This thread and the thoughts I’ve shared were inspired by a recently read essay on African socialism by Jukius K. Nyerere, who was the President of Tanganyika, a former British colony that would become Tanzania. Nyere conceived of the socialist theory called Ujamaa, which was grounded upon the belief that a fulfilling life is one lived among a community that works collectively to ensure that no man or woman goes without their basic needs, so long as he or she contributes. I don’t know if humans are innately selfish and greedy. It’s difficult to determine how true that is when you’re living in a world that has become captive to corporations who bombard our every waking moment with appeals to consume their products.That's the idealized world. I should read more about Soviet Union communities, because what you are describing is the general gist of descriptions I have come across when associated with some of them, barring any Stalin atrocities. But my knowledge of the Soviet Union is primarily WW2 based, I never read deeply into any leftist social science or philosophy on the topic.
What you are suggesting is what I lean towards, I'm really about improving overall wellbeing for all sentient life, but I can agree with your sentiment. Problem is, and the reasoning for why I don't typically dive deep into leftist literature, is that I see it is an impossibility, at least with the current generation of humans, who are just so self-centered, rude, and a host of negative qualities that are diametrically opposed with sacrifice, which is what will be needed to maintain an environment like the one you promote. In order to cope with that realization, I push for what is practical, seems it's all you can do if you are being honest.
I mean look, your thread is enitelly good natured, and yet it was still met with hostility, jokes, derailment, and it will likely fade into the background versus the average drama thread.
Simply put, the average worker has been conditioned to support the system that binds them to it, all under the presumption that they may one day break free from that binding. But you already noted it in this thread, and I already know it, their likelihood of breaking free from that bind is slim to none.
It's a vicious cycle, and those with the eyes to see it are truly cursed.
I believe that this is based on a commonly peddled misconception about socialism that the right uses to distort its fundamental purpose. The man who toils 100 hours might be able to enjoy pleasures outside the reach of the man who works for 40 hours, but the latter is still assured that he will not want for good food, a roof and warm bed, and medical care when he falls ill. The man who works 100 hours and owns a business can even treat himself to luxury goods, as long as some of the profits he receives are channeled back into the community.The problem with this thinking is many men aren't willing to contribute as best they can to the betterment of society which creates a huge free rider problem for those who are. Is it fair that the man willing to work 100hr weeks gets the same result as the one working 40? Is it fair that the man with hgiher ambitions and risk tolerance gets the same result as the extremely complacent one?
I will look into that, "Ujamaa". Regarding the condition, I don't think it innate, else what stops you or me from thinking the same? I should note, I'm a determinist, and because of that I think it is the environment that is the central cause of makes people opposed to these ideas.This thread and the thoughts I’ve shared were inspired by a recently read essay on African socialism by Jukius K. Nyerere, who was the President of Tanganyika, a former British colony that would become Tanzania. Nyere conceived of the socialist theory called Ujamaa, which was grounded upon the belief that a fulfilling life is one lived among a community that works collectively to ensure that no man or woman goes without their basic needs, so long as he or she contributes. I don’t know if humans are innately selfish and greedy. It’s difficult to determine how true that is when you’re living in a world that has become captive to corporations who bombard our every waking moment with appeals to consume their products.
I’m giving serious thought to the idea that black people and capitalism don’t mix. I’m starting to think the inherent selfishness of capitalism isn’t in our nature.
![]()
The Survey's target population includes 7685 philosophers drawn from two groups: (1) From Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the US (6112 philosophers): all regular faculty members (tenure-track or permanent) in BA-granting philosophy departments with four or more members (according to the PhilPeople database).
Most people don't need millions to be free if.they actually sat down and did the numbers...For in a just society, no man would concern himself with his lack of wealth. A society that cares about its citizens is one in which no man should worry that he may never become a millionaire. A man willing to contribute as best he can, in a society that is equitable, is a man who will never feel the pang of hunger nor the pavement when he lays in his bed.
![]()