Piff Perkins
Veteran
Economic sabotage. The fed has almost unilaterally kept the economy from falling off a fukking cliff. Under normal circumstances, with two logical parties at the table, would I be fine with Toomey's language being added? Sure, because it simply states congress should play a role in authorizing the fed's emergency spending decisions. But we don't have two logical parties. We have one logical party, and one party that will do anything to harm the economy in order to regain power.
What's to stop them from blocking fed spending in two months when it's even more clear that the economy is fukked? What's to stop them from bargaining during the next stimulus negotiation and saying you can either get stimulus checks ($600), fed money, or state govt money...but you can only pick one. They see 2022 and 2024 on the horizon and expect to win both elections by extending the recession. It's obvious.
What can democrats do? No much, frankly. If they don't regain the senate next month it's over regardless. Nor can they write checks they can't cash. If only they had won one more senate seat in November...nuking the filibuster would be on the table IF they could win both Georgia seats next month. That way you'd be able to say if we win these seats, we WILL do xyz. You will get retroactive checks and state money, if we win. And since they'd have an extra seat, Manchin wouldn't be a problem; for those unaware he has made it clear he will not vote to end the filibuster under any circumstances. But instead even if they win both GA seats it'll be 50 to 50 in the senate, with Kamala being the tie breaker. Enough to ram through bills via reconciliation but everything else would be threatened by filibuster...








Don’t play with my emotions.
JP Morgan and other big banks have been doing this since last year. Why were they all getting bailed out daily needing the Fed to pump in billions to the repo market? 