1. I'm not against MW, entirely.Yeah, I didn't say anything about the minimum wage being the sole reason for wage stagnation. It's a factor and was proven in the 90s during the last increase that companies had to raise wages within for people making above the MW. It also helps competition in the market for people seeking jobs. There are many other factors such as the destruction of unions, younger people replacing older people in the market, and potential interest rate hikes, etc.
You seem to be coming at this more emotionally than I am though. At some point, the minimum wage will have to increase to reflect the times. Has nothing to do with being Mother Teresa-like or anything. If I'm understanding your perspective there shouldn't be a floor and we just let companies decide wages based on other metrics? Or is it "states rights?" Because, if it's still $7.25 in let's say 2050, that would be kind of ridiculous am I right?
2. I support as small of a MW increase as possible...for the sake of minorities and the working poor. Its their jobs at stake, not mine.
3. I think a culture change is what will fix stagnant wages
4. I think there is a profound misunderstanding of what MW is meant to represent in the eyes of the law and that many people cling to it as a means of absolving themselves of systemic economic reform in places that really affect people's lives. You don't work for MW. I don't work for MW. But why are wages stagnant? Its clearly from the core of the organizations we work for. Think THAT way and you may find more insight.
5. If I'm so "emotional," why am I the only one in here with data and sources to substantiate my arguments?
