This is what I wondered. Don't higher paying jobs tend to be more competitive or attract a higher talent pool? However, my concern splits from yours in that most jobs that pay their employees well also put money in the infrastructure as well. I wonder how that would play out with schools.This is a difficult one for me. On one hand, some of you know that I'm teacher, an in that sense, obviously I think I deserve higher pay for the work that I do. But, on the other hand, and sadly, I don't believe that the majority of the people I work with deserve higher pay. Frankly, I think a lot of them get paid too much for the half assed effort they put forth.
From a long term perspective, I think higher pay would result in higher expectations and eventually better teachers. So, in that sense, I also think higher pay would a reflect a society that actually values education, and more qualified people will enter the professional. Where I get hung up though, is the higher expectations, and the degree to which the union protects sub par teachers.
Don't over think it. You and all your sub par colleagues deserve it. There are people actively hurting society that make way more than you.This is a difficult one for me. On one hand, some of you know that I'm a teacher, an in that sense, obviously I think I deserve higher pay for the work that I do. But, on the other hand, and sadly, I don't believe that the majority of the people I work with deserve higher pay. Frankly, I think a lot of them get paid too much for the half assed effort they put forth.
From a long term perspective, I think higher pay would result in higher expectations and eventually better teachers. So, in that sense, I also think higher pay would reflect a society that actually values education, and more qualified people will enter the profession. Where I get hung up, though, is the higher expectations, and the degree to which the union protects sub par teachers.
It's a great point. Facilities is a huge expense that also needs to be better funded. Every year these schools that were built in the 70's or whatever are getting older and more unacceptable. I think that's more a local issue, where the communities need to approve higher budgets for facilities. I understand being skepticle of proposed school budgets because of the money that gets squandered, though, so that's a tough one too.This is what I wondered. Don't higher paying jobs tend to be more competitive or attract a higher talent pool? However, my concern splits from yours in that most jobs that pay their employees well also put money in the infrastructure as well. I wonder how that would play out with schools.
Good point.Don't over think it. You and all your sub par colleagues deserve it. There are people actively hurting society that make way more than you.
my parents teach, this sounds like some of the shyt my dad says ( i know that will shock a lot of youThis is a difficult one for me. On one hand, some of you know that I'm a teacher, an in that sense, obviously I think I deserve higher pay for the work that I do. But, on the other hand, and sadly, I don't believe that the majority of the people I work with deserve higher pay. Frankly, I think a lot of them get paid too much for the half assed effort they put forth.
.
its definitely bad, but you have to take into account that their employer (the state, us) is on the hook for 80 percent of their salary from about age 55 til the day they die, for doing absolutely nothing in those 20 yearsI've been keeping an eye on this as my wife is a teacher. SC isn't unionized so I'm uncertain if a walkout would even be possible. But there are some school districts around here with a starting salary of 26k...like seriously that is just insulting.
The problem is the base pay for teachers is too low.@Shogun if we could accurately assess teachers, doesn’t the union make it impossible to link pay to merit? Meaning pay good teachers more than bad ones?
Sure, my question is could you pay good teachers(individually) more? Or does the union prevent that?The problem is the base pay for teachers is too low.
You could always attempt increase incentive pay for teachers, but that is still an issue of funding and you'd also increase turnover in what may already be a diminished pool.
Regardless, teacher pay isn't low because teachers are bad
Sure, my question is could you pay good teachers(individually) more? Or does the union prevent that?
Edit: and I think the perception that they(teachers) are bad hurts the push for higher teacher pay... buts that’s just my opinion.