There is no such thing as a ‘talent’ or ‘eye test’ argument for Brady vs Mahomes

Raquinotj

#NBATwitter #NBAReddit #6ixRings #PatsNation
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,327
Reputation
-1,426
Daps
51,421
Reppin
City of champions BAWSTON
Coli always moving the Goal posts. Now rings don’t matter. Brady Literally had 3 Hall Of Fame careers, what makes Brady the goat it’s not just the rings, it’s the longevity and how effective and dominant he was towards the end of his career.


Don’t forget that Old man Brady also gave Patty Mahomes THAT WORK when it mattered and just like he did to Manning prevented him from winning a couple of rings.

 

MoshpitMazi

Moshpit Gxng/ Anti Fash
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
5,385
Reputation
255
Daps
12,203
Reppin
Stone Mountain GA
Unlike that son kisser in Tom Brady, mahomes never needed to deflate footballs or spy on the other teams plays to win super bowls so yeah...


we'll be fine.
 

Raquinotj

#NBATwitter #NBAReddit #6ixRings #PatsNation
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,327
Reputation
-1,426
Daps
51,421
Reppin
City of champions BAWSTON
Unlike that son kisser in Tom Brady, mahomes never needed to deflate footballs or spy on the other teams plays to win super bowls so yeah...


we'll be fine.

He had other type of assistance, media never got on it because the chiefs dont have 6 rings.

 

MoshpitMazi

Moshpit Gxng/ Anti Fash
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
5,385
Reputation
255
Daps
12,203
Reppin
Stone Mountain GA
He had other type of assistance, media never got on it because the chiefs dont have 6 rings.


Yeah a chiefs fan pointing a laser is the same thing as intentionally tampering with the gameball or Coaches taping other teams plays.


Y'all rings and legacy funny my g
:mjlol:
 

Raquinotj

#NBATwitter #NBAReddit #6ixRings #PatsNation
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,327
Reputation
-1,426
Daps
51,421
Reppin
City of champions BAWSTON
Yeah a chiefs fan pointing a laser is the same thing as intentionally tampering with the gameball or Coaches taping other teams plays.


Y'all rings and legacy funny my g
:mjlol:


Haha. You never been to a game. How did that a laser that powerful make it into the stadium? Obviously it wasn't no random fan, it didn’t matter, Patriots just played through it and sent their ass home.

 
Last edited:

CourtesyFlush

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
7,338
Reputation
-625
Daps
32,830
Reppin
NULL
The Jordan/Bron "skill" thing is dishonest too because LeBron clearly does as many basketball skills better than Jordan, as Jordan had skills better than Bron, yet most people still favor Jordan over Bron...

In 35-40 years of NBA history befire Jordan Propaganda consumed The Culture, GOAT-level players were NEVER judged by "who has the most rings". It was not that rudimentary. Jordan Propaganda took over Basketball Culture, and disingenuously fooled people into ring counting, something not rooted in NBA history, nor was it even honest with Jordan as he has nowhere near the most championships ever...

Jordan nikkas created this ring counting bullshyt, but when you point out Russell to them, you get the "look at Russell's era" shyt, downplaying the competition Russell played against in Jordan's favor, pointing out that Jordan was a better basketball player while playing better opponents in a more skilled era. And that opens up more inconsistency from Jordan heads, who always have this one set of rules that apply to Jordan but aren't consistent across the board------>because LeBron very clearly played vs better competition, in a more stacked era, with more skilled players across the board, and the "talent/skill" shyt is a wash because both did a variety of different things better than the other one; I could easily make an argument that Bron does more things better...

You know, the same argument Mike nikkas use against Bill Russell. So it's never consistent, rings only matter to Jordan heads if Jordan has more than the person being compared to him, but if the one guy has more rings, oh it's not about rings anymore, its shyt on that era, tell me who was a better basketball player...

I'm saying all that as a preface, that this Brady/Mahomes debate is the same thing in reverse, with instead of most people favoring the OG, they are favoring the young guy over the guy from the past...

I'm consistent with this----->I don't care about who has the flashier skillset, who may be more skilled. I don't care to count rings. Pat doesn't need 7 to be considered better than Brady to me. Or 6, and maybe not even 5. It's about the degree of dominance, how long you sustain that dominance, and how you perform in the playoffs. You have to win rings along the way, nobody is in the GOAT QB convo with fewer than 2 rings; Pat already has 2 and could hit 3 in 10 days. Clearly, you have to win rings to enter the convo and he's doing that...

But I'm never on the, "gotta be _____ (amount of) rings". That shyt don't matter...

But what we keep hearing from Mahomes Stan's are, man he's way more talented than Brady. Look at the throws Mahomes can make, the trick plays. Look at how he keeps plays alive from outside the pocket, while also dominating as a pocket thrower. All this extra shyt...

We saw Brady dominate year over year for decades. To really threaten Brady you gotta threaten that longevity, Brady had about a 15-year prime. You gotta have some of the performances Brady had, Mahomes' best Suoer Bowl was last year and he was terrific but I can think of three Brady Super Bowls better than Mahomes' best. That's what Mahomes is competing against..
Jordan was my dude growing up but the ring argument vs LeBron is so hypocritical by Jordan stans using it to claim that's why he's the GOAT, he doesn't have the most rings!
 

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,540
Reputation
2,430
Daps
46,174
Brady is the GOAT of accolades.

But anyone with two eye balls can see Mahomes is the most talented qb and perhaps the most talented football player ever.

‘Talent’ is an irrelevant accolade determining goat at QB bc the position is not predicated on “talent”

The implication of “talent” is physical traits. Well Mike Vick is more “talented”. Lamar Jackson is more talented. Jeff George in your top 10? 5 years ago we were giving Aaron Rodgers that ‘most talented ever’ title. He better than Brady too? Enough

For a QB, IQ is a “talent”. Reading a defense is a “talent”. Decision making is a “talent”. It’d be one thing if he won 7 rings as a game manager with no stats. No. He got stats too. So whatever he did to manipulate a defense and find the open man, that is a “talent”. That’s the position, mastering it IS the talent.

It’s such a casual cookie cutter statement to say someone who throws harder is ‘more talented’.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
143,301
Reputation
25,670
Daps
479,667
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
What’s happening is people are applying a Bron vs Jordan mindset and applying it to Mahomes vs Brady. This is stupid for many reasons

1- In hoops, players can play noticeably different. Visually different. Statistically different. There is enough nuance that, one can value points over assists, one can value defense, Playmaking vs scoring, etc. There are enough differences where it can be more subjective

With football, this is not the case. No matter how “talented” a QB is, a 10 yard out is a 10 yard out. A deep crosser is a deep crosser. The concept of a QB finding open men and passing to them is too straightforward, so “talent” cannot manifest at the QB position (for non rushing QBs)

Example, Kyrie is perhaps the most “talented” PG ever. You can SEE it. Hoops is played in a way that he can physically do things outside the box that others can’t. On a nightly basis. For non rushing QBs, this doesn’t exist. In the course of a game, season, hell career, there are only a handful of plays that are genuinely outside the box that displays abnormal “talent”. Ie a throw across the field, or a 70 yard bomb, a no look, etc. The problem is, not only is it far and few between based on how the game is played and defended, but also many QBs can do that. Matt Stafford was doing no looks before Mahomes. Baker mayfield owns the record for longest air yard pass.

Yet these are the type of ambiguous ‘tAlEnt’ arguments people make for Mahomes…it’s even funnier now considering that they no longer play like that :wtf:

2- There is only 1 path to goat for QBs that’s rings. It is not the same as NBA. Now I could definitely see if someone wants to discount Brady’s first two. Bc he was a game manager. Cool. He still has 5 left :snoop:WHILE putting up gaudy stats. This shouldn’t even be an argument. It only is bc 24/7 news culture has fried peoples brain and no one has the patience to see if Mahomes willcatch Brady, they want the immediate debate even when the count is 7 rings to 2.
Forgot to add “in my opinion” 😂
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
143,301
Reputation
25,670
Daps
479,667
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Clearly there is. Even a non role player, all time great can have more chips than another all time great but not be considered better

The OBVIOUS example is Jordan > Bill Russell despite having 5 less rings

Also, as much as Kobe fans hate it, Bron > Kobe despite having 1 less

In the QB discussion that doesn’t exists bc 1) Brady has set the mark so high, and 2) there are no other players with comparable rings.

Crazy to think about it but at one out we thought it COULD be like hoops, when the debate was Manning and Brady. Brady just had better teams but manning had better numbers. At one point you could argue Manning > Brady even with less rings.

Well, Brady blew that out the water when he started putting up gaudy numbers himself, and when he won 4,5 more rings. The debate ended
For me, Pat gotta get at least 5 to entertain GOAT QB

Talent wise he has no peer imo

What media heads need to do is stop tryin to make him have a rival, he has none
 
Top