There's A Difference Between The GOAT And YOUR GOAT

CHICAGO

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,054
Reputation
13,217
Daps
397,620
Reppin
CHICAGO
Cladyclad said:
it’s clearly generational lol
sprinkled in with casual.

nobody I know in their 60s think MJ the goat
Click to expand...

:mjlol:MJ IS IN HIS 60S...

WHY WOULDN'T THE ADULTS WHO SAW HIM
WIN 6 TITLES NOT THINK HES THE GOAT?

WHAT AGE GROUP YOU
THINK WERE GOING TO THE GMS
IN THE 90S?




:devil:
:evil:

​
 
F

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
13,164
Reputation
-375
Daps
22,705
murksiderock said:
Every time you're shown LeBron dominated his era, you have no rebuttals. What is the criteria for dominance? From 2003-04 season to now:

•most championships? Bron with 4, tied with Steph for most of the last 21 years, next closest is 3 (Duncan)
•most championships as a #1? Bron with 4, no one else even has more than 2 in the last 21 years (Steph, Durant, Kobe, Duncan)
•most Finals appearances? Bron with 10, no one else has more than 6 in the last 21 years (Steph)
•most MVPs? Bron with 4, no one else has more than 2 in the last 21 years (Jokic, Giannis, Steph, Nash)
•most Top 5 MVP finishes? Bron with 14, no one else has more than 11 in the last 21 years (Kobe)
•most E/W conference finals appearances? Bron with 12, no one else has more than 6 (Steph, Durant, Duncan)

What other criteria do you have that illustrates dominance? By every single metric LeBron has been the most dominant player in basketball, and in most of these categories it's not even a close second, he's doubling up the next closest guy in most if these...

If he didn't play so long the dominance would be more apparent, some of you nikkas act like since he's plated forever he was never as great as he once was. There was clearly a time he was laps ahead of whoever the next best player in basketball was...

As it compares to Jordan, because his dominance doesn't look like Mike's yall degrade it, but both were the most dominant players of their era. Not even a question...

Yall like to play this longevity game but if you cut Bron's career off at 13 years (Mike's Bulls career) that would be 2003-16; if you cut Bron's career at 15 years (Mike's total career), that's 2003-18, and Bron would STILL be #1 in all these categories. He was the most dominant player in basketball before these extra years...
Click to expand...
It’s simple, Mike dominated his era in greater fashion than Lebron. You just typing a bunch of distractions, I never said Lebron wasn’t dominant in this era
 
Ces1ne?

Ces1ne?

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
2,178
Reputation
676
Daps
4,597
Reppin
NY
broller said:
I don't mean the total amount of rings. I mean looking at only the finals record. For instance, a 6-1 record is not worse and is in fact better than a 6-0 record in the finals. That's all I'm saying.

Obviously Jordan's record is better than LeBron's and I feel Jordan is the better player. But had LeBron won 6 but had the 5 losses, that should have been looked at favourably compared to Jordan's finals record. Getting there is a feat.

But not to say that that would have made LeBron better than Jordan overall even in that scenario.
Click to expand...
:dahell: Did u really just say “a 6-1 record is not worse and IN FACT better than a 6-0 record in the Finals”?????? U really typed that thinking that was the move to make??? :mindblown:
 
murksiderock

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
15,861
Reputation
7,054
Daps
49,068
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
fifth column said:
Mike have more impressive individual stats/accolades/moments than Lebron outside of the rings. Longevity is all Lebron has like Karl Malone
Click to expand...
Low quality posting by you yet again...

LeBron had his team in contention earlier in his career than Mike did; had his team in contention more often than Mike did; his biggest moment is considered by many to be THE greatest individual play ever seen; and the only reason he doesn't have more rings, or more than Mike------>

Is because there was no Steph Curry in Mike's era. Or Kevin Durant. Or Kawhi Leonard. Or Nikola Jokic. Or Giannis Antetokuonmpo. No competing dynasties like the Warriors when Mike started winning because Mike played for the Warriors...
 
B

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
27,515
Reputation
3,083
Daps
78,534
Ces1ne? said:
:dahell: Did u really just say “a 6-1 record is not worse and IN FACT better than a 6-0 record in the Finals”?????? U really typed that thinking that was the move to make??? :mindblown:
Click to expand...

Yes you fukkin idiot. 7 finals appearances is better than 6 you fukkin idiot. One team was playing an extra finals while the other team got eliminated earlier. How is that hard to understand?
 
Ces1ne?

Ces1ne?

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
2,178
Reputation
676
Daps
4,597
Reppin
NY
broller said:
Yes you fukkin idiot. 7 finals appearances is better than 6 you fukkin idiot.
Click to expand...
The 6-0 record indicates 100% u fckin’ moron…..sorry to hit a nerve. Get ‘Brons d!ck outta your mouth before typing b!tch. By your crack head logic the only conclusion is the 6-1 player has a FACTUALLY better conference finals record, no FINALS record. Reading is fundamental bruh. Go to sleep, you have middle school in the AM :therethere:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top