They're using Dr. King to sell trucks now

Poh SIti Dawn

Staying Positive, Getting Better Everyday. Holler!
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
13,827
Reputation
-2,866
Daps
17,252
Reppin
NULL
Well you nikkas wanted to be included and shyt. Shouldve kept your dumbass mouths closed and they wouldnt have revamped their exploitation of our culture.
 

richaveli83

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reputation
24,659
Daps
288,849
Reppin
Dallas, Texas but living in Houston, Texas
Sadly the king family doesnt own the rights to Dr.Kings speeches the cac Steven Spielberg owns them hell they couldnt even use the orignal speech for the selma movie they had to change the words around.:snoop:
Wait what? How the hell can someone "own" someone's speeches?! :dahell:
 

keond

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
26,175
Reputation
12,481
Daps
218,049
Reppin
ATLANTA
Sadly the king family doesnt own the rights to Dr.Kings speeches the cac Steven Spielberg owns them hell they couldnt even use the orignal speech for the selma movie they had to change the words around.:snoop:

The MLK estate has owned the rights to his speeches since 1963

Who owns the 17-minute speech? The King family. King himself obtained rights to his “I Have a Dream” speech a month after he gave it in 1963 when he sued two companies that were selling unauthorized copies. His family has since then received an income from exercising its intellectual property rights, and has gone to court to protect its copyright, including against CBS and USA Today ( though apparently not against educators who have used the speech in violation of the copyright). All of King’s speeches and papers are owned by his descendants. I asked representatives of the King Center in Atlanta to explain why the speech was never made public but the only response I got was an e-mailed intellectual property request form to fill out. Representatives for the King family have said in the past that the family wants educators to have access to it, and some King documents are available for free to researchers.

Spielberg owns the biopic rights from the era with those speeches

Selma director Ava DuVernay may well have taken more license than artistically necessary in the confrontational scenes between Martin Luther King Jr. and President Johnson. But inaccuracies in other significant parts of the film were forced upon DuVernay by copyright law. The film’s numerous scenes of King delivering powerful speeches regarding civil rights all had to be paraphrased, because the MLK estate has already licensed the film rights in those speeches to DreamWorks and Warner Bros., for an MLK biopic Steven Spielberg is slated to produce.

Keep in mind there is a reason why Coretta Scott King or any of her 4 kids ever had to have a full time gig.

But the commercial was disgusting. MLK didn't put his life in danger to sell Ram trucks
 
Top