Sadly the king family doesnt own the rights to Dr.Kings speeches the cac Steven Spielberg owns them hell they couldnt even use the orignal speech for the selma movie they had to change the words around.![]()
huh?

Sadly the king family doesnt own the rights to Dr.Kings speeches the cac Steven Spielberg owns them hell they couldnt even use the orignal speech for the selma movie they had to change the words around.![]()

They did this shyt on purpose to piss people off knowing that this would generate attention.Well you nikkas wanted to be included and shyt. Shouldve kept your dumbass mouths closed and they wouldnt have revamped their exploitation of our culture.
Who is "you"? Your statement makes me miss negs right now.Wait what? How the hell can someone "own" someone's speeches?!Sadly the king family doesnt own the rights to Dr.Kings speeches the cac Steven Spielberg owns them hell they couldnt even use the orignal speech for the selma movie they had to change the words around.![]()

If the shoe fits then wear it and get to steppin muhfukkaWho is "you"? Your statement makes me miss negs right now.

The McDonalds brothers who started the restaurant lost the rights to their own nameWait what? How the hell can someone "own" someone's speeches?!![]()

Man what? I gotta look into thisSadly the king family doesnt own the rights to Dr.Kings speeches the cac Steven Spielberg owns them hell they couldnt even use the orignal speech for the selma movie they had to change the words around.![]()
Sadly the king family doesnt own the rights to Dr.Kings speeches the cac Steven Spielberg owns them hell they couldnt even use the orignal speech for the selma movie they had to change the words around.![]()
Who owns the 17-minute speech? The King family. King himself obtained rights to his “I Have a Dream” speech a month after he gave it in 1963 when he sued two companies that were selling unauthorized copies. His family has since then received an income from exercising its intellectual property rights, and has gone to court to protect its copyright, including against CBS and USA Today ( though apparently not against educators who have used the speech in violation of the copyright). All of King’s speeches and papers are owned by his descendants. I asked representatives of the King Center in Atlanta to explain why the speech was never made public but the only response I got was an e-mailed intellectual property request form to fill out. Representatives for the King family have said in the past that the family wants educators to have access to it, and some King documents are available for free to researchers.
Selma director Ava DuVernay may well have taken more license than artistically necessary in the confrontational scenes between Martin Luther King Jr. and President Johnson. But inaccuracies in other significant parts of the film were forced upon DuVernay by copyright law. The film’s numerous scenes of King delivering powerful speeches regarding civil rights all had to be paraphrased, because the MLK estate has already licensed the film rights in those speeches to DreamWorks and Warner Bros., for an MLK biopic Steven Spielberg is slated to produce.


Well you nikkas wanted to be included and shyt. Shouldve kept your dumbass mouths closed and they wouldnt have revamped their exploitation of our culture.