Here's the thing I don't get with this evaluate by the week stuff. All those teams who beat aTm when they showed they weren't shyt, are those wins now elevated because they are undeservedly ranked in the T25 (and let's keep it ALL the way funky, no one believes that's a top anything squad). Or how about UCLA being #11 (once again, undeservedly), Zona St which lost them in the worse way possible, are they deserving of being #6? This beta voting system they have in place is built on straw man arguments and creates this slippery slope that they won't be able to maintain in the future. Are the same parameters being used to judge ALL teams or are we grading each school on a different scale? This shyt has major flaws brehs. Like Gizzle said, the BCS wasn't 100% perfect but more times than not, it got things right at the end. This is some fly by the seat of our pants shyt we're witnessing. For those who keep saying "as long as you're in the Top 4 you shouldn't be worried", this greatly effects whether you travel 1 or 3 time zones over, fans traveling, etc....