The article was worth a read and a good commentary on the illusion of the middle class. Two parents making 120k a year put together is better off than most americans will ever be but is only one pink slip away from 25k a year or even long term unemployment.
So often people mistakenly associate status and success with 'butter' like the brand of your car or the designer of your bag. The illusion of superiority is more important to a lot of folks in our society than the morals of thrift. There are two points in the article I find most interesting:
1 How she used her kids for sympathy.
- Why was the premature birth relevent here? She is a mother of two kids, she seemed to think her marriage/ child birth story was special( dont we all, its a big money maker for media and many other industries) and thus felt entitled to be middle class happily ever after. Guess she didnt get the memo about the middle class shrinking.
2
Clearly she thought she was more successful than she was. Her husband and her dont really do the most meaningful work, and there is always next young journalism student. Sounded like she wanted a medal for 'networking;' her way into her first media gig.
Now separating the article from the author offers a good commentary on the misperception and demonization of poor people. We all want to have nice things, I would even go so far as to say we are expected to have nice things, but we often have to obtain them by sacrificing savings and security. Most of us dont have education or suburban parents and their connections to fall back on.