Like many others have said in this thread, it does in certain situations, and only somebody that hasn't been around welfare would think this is true.
My mom was on welfare for a good 2 years after she got laid off, and the only requirement was that she had to apply for work biweekly, she had received a couple of offers but she never accepted between them not paying as much as her former MRI tech job and her being content with the benefits she was getting as a mother of 4 with the father not being in the house.
Keep in mind this is a college educated woman with a degree, all her job offers started at $22/hour; it much worst for woman would wouldn't even make that much.
I'm pretty sure some of ya'll have never even lived in a lower-class black area to be speaking on how to fix the problems. Because saying "welfare can't affect people decisions to work" is some dumb liberal ideologue shyt, not rooted in reality at all.
Sounds like she was receiving unemployment benefits, and she eventually went to work. Im failing to see the problem here. Those benefits went to good use as they were pumped right back into the economy benefitting us all. Those benefits allowed her security and granted her patience.
We we talk about de-incentivizing work, we're acting as if black people have $22 hr jobs, or something comparable, that are accessible, and yet we and we alone chose to exist on welfare benefits that are a fraction of that pay rate.
You keep trying to pull this corny rank that you grew up in the hood, and supposedly none of us did so you have all this inside knowledge..so with that how many great jobs were available in your hood that blacks were passing up for the purpose of laying around and existing on welfare? Was your hood a vibrant source of employment opportunities and economic activity? Or does welfare have some sort of relationship with the lack of opportunity present in many black neighborhoods?