I think you can compare eras in select cases where there are parallels and you take those important factors into account.
I think the Rick Ross run post-Deeper Than Rap is a fair comparison because neither of them had a true smash hit and were big because of the streets. DMX just benefitted from debuting in the right era. And I think Rick Ross could've had success in the late 90s, because Trick Daddy did. Even Silk Da Shocker had two platinum albums in the late 90s. I'm not saying he'd have DMX success, because he had a wave that went unmatched til 50 cent.
I agree that Drake is a product of his era though. He couldn't have survived any Pre-Kanye era because he didn't have the legitimacy that you needed back then. I don't think it's easier to have a run today though. I think it's tougher to break through when the top of the mainstream game is controlled by fewer artists, and shazam, spotify, and iTunes keeps the biggest artists at the forefront while keeping everyone else fighting for scraps.
DMX debut'd in the shiny suit era where you could argue he had to be really good to break through in that climate....Ross benefited post Jeezy era,and as you already said Drake benefited post Kanye...comparing a nikka who helped CHANGE the climate to nikkas who benefited from a climate somebody else already created

And to say Rick Ross had the streets?Also I think is a serious overstatement,especially if we gon compare it to how DMX and Trick daddy had the streets

And doesn't the bolded explain how its easier to have a run?We not talking about breaking through which is debatable seeing as how you can completely bypass having to get hot organically in your own backyard....you can skip that and go straight to getting the machine to push you.
But you admit yourself the mainstream game is controlled by a few artist,and how companys and media keep the big artist at the forefront....that in itself tells you its easier to have a long run if you agree the top artist are getting help to stay in that position
