Attacking your manhood? Where in my op did I insult you I an y deragotary way? I just simply pointed out for you to tell ne the difference between a 94 steve williams and a 2013 bully ray. But you went off on a victim tangent, which is actually typical of someone lacking a substantive argument. And if you are going to address me, qoute me like a man or don't say anything at all
Ohhh.... I see, Ok... I guess that Stan comment wasnt an attack. Even tho it is a popular verbal weapon by many on here. you obviously didnt mean it that way.... so my bad. Nor was vapid. And I'll pretend that you are not trynna talk down to me or flex or anything crazy like that... cuz this is a discussion right?
So my bad, moving along....
There are really no differences.
My comparison was mainly on how they had similar paths (like many others as well).
Both started out as lower mid carders, both were tag champs, both went on the other feds, climbed the ranks and became champs.
I dont see the big deal or issue with a guy like him being the champ when so many others walked the same road no matter how fast or long it took or how many federations they worked. Nor do I see what makes it a big deal that its this year with the whole "but in 2013" thing. And thats not even just sticking up for Bully, recently peeps been saying "bu bu but the Rock is the champ in 2013!!" Whats the problem with that? If they earned it they earned it, I still think its foul Scott Hall never got a shot or a reign.
Oh yea and come to think about it, in 94 when Austin was midcarding in WCW, I just remember that the WWE champ at the time was Bob Backlund.