I’d be ecstatic with triple OT.Need this to go 5 OT
Pulling for Blues, want revenge match for 19
I’d be ecstatic with triple OT.Need this to go 5 OT
Lowry? I guess its Bad Boys 4 Life.
Dinosaur league that stifles innovation. They desperately need their own D'Antoni to shake up the game.When will hockey coaches understand that sitting on leads and playing aggressively is a bad strategy. Saw it last night with the Avs and now tonight with the Blues.
Dinosaur league that stifles innovation. They desperately need their own D'Antoni to shake up the game.
It bugs me how defensemen are used offensively. It also bugs me that teams are committed to three forwards and two defensemen. I don't understand why the game hasn't evolved and someone says: "I'm just putting my five best guys out here and everyone will be able to attack and defend."It’s crazy a two goal lead isn’t safe at all anymore, this isn’t the early 2000s Dead Puck Era with the trap and refs being paid to do nothing (still isn’t great, but it’s a nudge better lol). Honestly, they should look at football and basketball with how they use motion and player movement. My gameplan would attack the weakest skater/defensive player with switches/mismatches whether it’s offensive or neutral zone. There is still levels of innovation to go, but as long as the retreads still be jobs it won’t happen.
It bugs me how defensemen are used offensively. It also bugs me that teams are committed to three forwards and two defensemen. I don't understand why the game hasn't evolved and someone says: "I'm just putting my five best guys out here and everyone will be able to attack and defend."
Or, if my defensemen attacks the crease, a forward might have to rotate back and become a defensemen.
Why are teams still adamant that defensemen stay around the blue line (besides a couple guys like Cale Makar and Quinn Hughes)?