If the accusations were proven false, legal action against the accusers would not.If the the POTUS has rape accusations on the table, that actually WOULD be a good thing to resolve
If the accusations were proven false, legal action against the accusers would not.If the the POTUS has rape accusations on the table, that actually WOULD be a good thing to resolve
If the accusations were proven false, legal action against the accusers would not.
Stats show people don't report it enough. Trump going after accusers would make the actual problem worseDepends. May need some deterrence or people will keep doing it...
Of course, if POTUS went after them, the burden of proof would fall on POTUS to prove a lie.
Stats show people don't report it enough. Trump going after accusers would make the actual problem worse
By all means ...lets
start with Harth
McDowell told her story initially to The New York Times in May 2016[48]
this is NOT years before
The suit was withdrawn when a "parallel suit" her husband had filed against Trump was settled by Trump agreeing to pay an undisclosed sum of money.
Occams razor tells me
How did this become a conversation on Trump rape allegations?
May 2016 is before anyone had knowledge of the tape. Two seperate accounts of the same exact behavior Trump later admitted to. The chances of that occurring and him not doing it are infinitesimal, There's no way to spin it.
Wow This position is as liberal as his policy to stop and frisk minorities!!!!
Losing a court case doesn't mean your charges are lies, especially when the defendant's bank accounts are 1000x as big as yours. Corporations use this to their advantage all the time.Seriously doubt less people with actual cases would come forward just because liars got caught lying.
The only thing I'll say is that I think both parties' name should be anonymous because even if you win the case your name is tied to rape forever. As for only 2% of rape cases being false, that just means legally false--as in decided by the courts that it was false. Most cases get dropped because they're he say-she say. And that's really the reason I think both parties should have their names sealed.Losing a court case doesn't mean your charges are lies, especially when the defendant's bank accounts are 1000x as big as yours. Corporations use this to their advantage all the time.
So basically you are suggesting that unless a woman has an open and shut case of rape she shouldn't come forward, which is exactly what happens, even without the huge financial advantage Trump has over his victims.
But you're right, it's more important that rapists able to cover their tracks escape conviction than more victims come forward, even if they don't have a billionaire's legal counsel or a completely open shut case :idiot:
Losing a court case doesn't mean your charges are lies, especially when the defendant's bank accounts are 1000x as big as yours. Corporations use this to their advantage all the time.
So basically you are suggesting that unless a woman has an open and shut case of rape she shouldn't come forward, which is exactly what happens, even without the huge financial advantage Trump has over his victims.
But you're right, it's more important that rapists able to cover their tracks escape conviction than more victims come forward, even if they don't have a billionaire's legal counsel or a completely open shut case :idiot:
What the hell are you talking about?
I'm saying if someome can prove that someone knowingly lied about rape, there should be a punishment there.
I'm not suggesting if someone can't prove rape they claim, they get punished. I'm saying if its shown they lied about the whole thing, then they get punished. Like this case:
A Rape on Campus - Wikipedia