Russia doesn't kill and kidnap people?Yeah, that's not as bad as killing and kidnapping people.I'm sure you see the uh reasonable difference.
Dissent is supposed to be what makes this country great. If you don't think so maybe you should take your own advice.
better still... 
Yer getting way off topic breh. I'll just say Russia isn't doing anything we didn't do to them.Russia doesn't kill and kidnap people?
The guy they helped elect wants to imprison journalists and political opponents for dissent.
But that doesn't bother you:PatriceTrump:
Falsehood/distortion #1: It was well-known that Putin hated Clinton and would have opposed her regardless of who ran against her, that was always part of the narrative from the beginning.
No they don't.
No it doesn't.
What forensic evidence do you expect them to have handed over to people like you at this point?
No they don't.
How would Putin wanting Clinton to lose prove that he didn't also want Trump to win?
How would Putin wanting Clinton to lose prevent him from colluding with Trump to make it happen?
That's like saying that because I've hated Kobe since before I even knew who LeBron was, I therefore have never actually been a LeBron fan.
No it doesn't.
What difference would it make if Trump learned about the indictments now or four days ago? It would make literally no difference to Trump's involvement at all. If Trump is a target, then why wouldn't they let him know about the indictments a few days early? They're still going to treat him as the chief executive and the person the Justice Department reports to in all details except those which directly implicate him or which would give away an aspect of the case that they don't want given way. This does neither.
People like me?What forensic evidence do you expect them to have handed over to people like you at this point?
That’s your trump loving eyes. He briefed trump because he’s the president. Doesn’t mean other parts of the investigation couldn’t contain trump.Its about the "russian phishing" scheme they ran on low-security cyber entities
What separated Clintons personal data from any other candidate was the fact her campaign chairman, Podesta's password was "p@ssword" so it was more likely to be infiltrated.
Contrary to what the DNI assessment analyzed, the indictment concluded that the Russians began to plan releasing emails before Trump was the nominee (at the time Cruz was favorited).
Those two statements alone discredits any idea of collusion between Trump/Russia to steal the election from Hillary as the initial russia assessment described.
The fact that Rosenstein himself said he briefed Trump on the indictments days ago should indicate to a working brain that Trump isnt a target in Mueller's investigation
but of course this will be repeatedly glossed over but it is what it is
Sidenote- we still dont have forensic evidence of anything
Because it's irrelevant. The fact that Putin hates Clinton is well-established. The fact that Trump has long-term ties to Russia and is relatively easy to manipulate is well-established. Adding in other fortuitous circumstances doesn't change those facts.
You get your signals crossed? Being favored over Cruz is being favored in the Republican primaries. I'm not aware of any claims that Putin tried to interfere with the Republican primary. We are referring to interference in the general election, right?If he could see Trump having so much favoribility why would he need to “interfere” in the first place
You will learn over time that everything I say makes sense. if you ever see something that doesn't make sense, that is a sign you need to read more carefully.
Rosenstein knew that the second the indictments are announced, they would directly implicate Roger Stone. If he knows more than that, why would he tip his hand by hiding the indictments from Trump? In briefly Trump he must have let Trump know that Stone was implicated (which Stone had probably inferred himself anyways, and would have known within days regardless), but he doesn't have to let Trump know what else he knows. If he had hid the indictments from Trump, that would have tipped Trump to knowing that he had passed from chief executive to suspect. Why would they tip him off to that when briefing him doesn't impair any aspect of the investigation whatsoever?The main aspect of this indictment should directly implicate Trump if there’s any truth to the Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy. But a las it doesn’t so Rosenstein can brief him on it
Yeah, no-names whoPeople like me?
for right-wing 
on the internet. Why do you think any of the "forensic evidence" from an investigation like this is ever gonna be placed before your eyes?
This indictment is about the people that was actually doing the hacking. The guys that was actually on the computer or whatever. Nobody thought the trump campaign was involved in the actual hacking. Nobody thought Jared Kushner was sitting with the Russians trying to break into servers with them.
It’s irrelevant yet included in the indictment. Apparently mueller thought it was substantial
They tried the same spearphishing tactics on the GOP in 2015. So the interference in the case of this indictment is not exclusive to the general election.
Yeah, no-names who
You do realize that subjects may become targets of investigations as investigations evolve and more information is gathered? Trump is currently a subject. Aka a person of interest. Person of interest aka subject either becomes innocent, or a target. You should wait and let this play out before jumping to conclusions.
Stoppppp. Roger Stone literally said something similar on CNN yesterday. Don't believe the indictment but ask for forensic evidence knowing that the Russians will never stand trial for the evidence to be presented. That's desperation talking points. That's some shyt the Russians would say or the clowns on info wars would say.
