it cant hurt, and it has to help at least a little bit, probably more. i dont see how that can be argued
U.S. top court rules for companies on birth control mandate
- Thread starter ExodusNirvana
- Start date
was this the split on this/a case? or they just do that randomly
You have more control over having children than you do with health issues. Again, rape is an exception.
What does this have to do with anything?
Because you're comparing medical issues like asthma and erectile dysfunction which is out of a persons control to getting pregnant (non rape) which people can control. It doesnt make sense to me.
By that logic why should they cover pregnancies? 
I dont think it makes a difference. If people want to be irresponsible they will. I dont think they are going to care if they are covered or not.it cant hurt, and it has to help at least a little bit, probably more. i dont see how that can be argued
Oh yeah because every rape case is that easy. Sorry breh don't mind me
By that logic why should they cover pregnancies?
I think maternity coverage should be a rider that women (or families) pay for. It shouldn't be covered under standard insurance.
No it doesn't matter. Health care is health care.
People can control being fat and now having to go on cholesterol medicine and shyt as well
BC is a form of preventive health care the same as mammograms
How can a company get to pick in choose which type of healthcare their employees can receive
OneManGang
Veteran
It literally makes my brain hurt that people can't understand this simple concept.
MidwestD
Clyde Frog's Shooter
was this the split on this/a case? or they just do that randomly
the pic is a couple years old I believe. Funny thing is, if Alito and them came out lookin like that, I wouldn't even be surprised
I feel the same about obesity related diseases. I dont feel there is anything wrong with individuals being responsible for parts of their healthcare. The cost of insurance is expensive so i can see why a company wouldnt want to pay for something that goes against their religion/moral stance or whatever. I do understand and agree with some of what youre saying though.
Storms are because gay people? Huh??? What does that even mean? What do storms and gay people have to do with the federal government violating the Constitution's freedom of religion protections with its birth control mandate?
What the hell does rape have to do with this case? My God, can any of you left wingers string together a coherent sentence?
And stop with the false choices about this case resulting in unwanted children. Hobby Lobby not paying for your birth control doesn't prevent you from paying 10 bucks a month to buy your own birth control at Wall Mart. It is called personal responsibility.......something you left wingers know nothing about.
It is the Catholic church that teaches that birth control is a sin and the owners of Hobby Lobby are practicing Catholics. So now you are trying to tell me that the Catholic church doesn't care about poor children? I guess all the hospitals, clinics, schools, homeless shelters, soup kitchens, etc run by the Catholic church in every city in America are all just figments of my imagination.
Your ignorance is literally giving me a headache.