Interesting, bluffing or not?
Interesting, bluffing or not?
I genuinely think they may be spread too thinI mean you have 2 companies, yet to turn a profit, that are forced to compete. Uber can't set the prices they'd need to thrive as a company, because their customers will turn to Lyft.
They probably need to bite off 4-5$ for that initial fee. Either that or they lower our profits and then we're out
Shut down in the 5th largest economy in the world because you dont want to treat your drivers as employees
![]()
I took pleasure in the demise of the cab industry because of their attitude....same goes for those NigeriansLast time I was in a cab was 2013. The Indian pestered me about “did I have the money to pay”, pooted in the car and it cost like $40 for a 15 minute ride.
no thank you
Would Walmart leave Cali though? Cali ain’t New Mexicothat's the walmart principle of operation. if a town or city unionize the whole province/state is not getting a walmart.
Youre an idiot. Uber almost always sides with the customer. Im certain you soiled the vehicle with your dirty ass.Repost:
A few years ago, an Uber driver charged me $50 for leaving "excessive soil on the vehicle floor". Of course I needed receipts so I told her to send me a picture.
I got the pic and there were only 2 strands of grass on the floor and I wasn't even SITTING ON THAT SIDE.
Took almost 2 months of going back and forth with them to get my money back. So since then, I've been like "Fukk Uber"
i get you, but they are hiding under the guise of ride sharing apps.I think brehs shytting on Uber and Lyft may not be old enough to remember what it was like being black and trying to catch a cab. I'll support Uber, Lyft, or whatever the hell else shows up because at least with them my black ass could actually get a ride.
fukk cabs.
Ethiopians ran the cab game in Atlanta and fukk all of them.
that's the walmart principle of operation. if a town or city unionize the whole province/state is not getting a walmart.
i get you, but they are hiding under the guise of ride sharing apps.
uber can stay in business, but make them actually follow regulations as cab services, they just a cab service with an app at this point, but skirting all the regulations.
the fact they want to shut down under some minor regulatory shyt, should show you that it's bullshyt.
lyft and uber are right.
fukk Cali for their horrible anti-business climate.
cabs companies never gave employees benefits. Not sure why cali feels Uber and Lyft need to.
so they can't afford to do business, then they shouldn't be in business.Except that would cost more money imagine now being responsible for say medical benefits or workman’s comp
you keep falling for the AI tech bros scheme, every time.so they can't afford to do business, then they shouldn't be in business.
their goal was never to create jobs for drivers, it was to stay in business long enough to have auto driving cars and pay no one.
you keep falling for the AI tech bros scheme, every time.
then maybe the cab companies shouldn't have been in business either.How far away are ai cars ?so they can't afford to do business, then they shouldn't be in business.
their goal was never to create jobs for drivers, it was to stay in business long enough to have auto driving cars and pay no one.
you keep falling for the AI tech bros scheme, every time.