Brady's phone was never subject to evidence so it's a red herring. Brady told the NFL that he was not giving them his phone months ago, and Wells was cool with it because he had no right to it. They asked him again and Tom was honest and was like "I destroyed that shyt anyway." Otherwise, I have no idea where you are getting your facts from aside from NFL talking points which their own footnotes undermine consistently. You're playing that "I'm just saying but I'm not a lawyer shyt and I'm taking sides while clearly taking a side" shyt. You sit here and ignore the fact that Brady and his attorneys went to the phone companies and tried to recover his old texts but could not because the records were gone. You literally are trying to implicate a dude not based on an actual act because science and the NFL's procedure dismiss that, but based on the fact that he just so happened to have one old phone lying around. The fact that you even tried to analyze that is ridiculous in and of itself. The NFL procedure is not a legal proceeding, and you cannot punish someone for not giving you something after not affording them notice of the fact that they will be liable if they do so. Brady was never informed that non-compliance with giving his phone, something the NFLPA bargained for in the CBA is somehow going to make him liable. If Brady goes up there and just lies and says, "I got it but I'm not giving it to you," this is not a story because it could not be used. That's how foolish that point is.