Was 2016 Warriors a Good team with a Great Player (Curry) or Super Team?

[Teko]

That was the consensus that they were

Bron = 25+ scorer
Kyrie = 20+ scorer
Love = 26 And 12 the year before


They had waiters, traded nothin to the Knicks to get shump and jr and traded for mosgov.


Even going into the offs(before love got hurt) most had Cavs winning it all

Have a star already on your roster and during the offseason get prime bron and prime Kevin to join the team and say the team ain’t a super team brehs

Double check that coz it's not true

 

[Ineedmoney504]

Double check that coz it's not true

The consensus was that no jump shooting team will ever win a ship. Just cause the Cavs under performed don’t change the facts

 

[DillaTUDE]

If the 2016 Warriors are a superteam with just two stars, an elite roleplayer and a good supporting cast then you've got to consider last seasons Rockets as one as well. They had two stars (Harden and CP3), an elite roleplayer (Capela) and a great supporting cast (Gordon, Tucker, Ariza, Mbah a Moute, etc.).

 

[MostReal]

The consensus was that no jump shooting team will ever win a ship. Just cause they under performed don’t change the facts

Facts breh nothing but facts, they were not a Super Team

 

[Big Boss]

If the 2016 Warriors are a superteam with just two stars, an elite roleplayer and a good supporting cast then you've got to consider last seasons Rockets as one as well. They had two stars (Harden and CP3), an elite roleplayer (Capela) and a great supporting cast (Gordon, Tucker, Ariza, Mbah a Moute, etc.).

This

 

[Regular_P]

I made this thread in February and most of the board clowned me.

True or false: The Warriors overachived before Durant got there.

 

[Liquid]

They were a super team before Durant.

LOL @ this blatant attempt to diminish the LeBron championship

 

[Osmosis]

If KD joined the Cavs that year the same dudes in here would be arguing that the Cavs were a super team prior to KD signing. It’s all semantics clearly but the Warriors were the best team in the league and KD made them even better. Just like if KD was magically able to sign with the Cavs, it would be GG for the league.

 

[MostReal]

There wasn't a single mention of them being a superteam during their entire 2014-15 campaign and they even lost a key player in David Lee heading into the 2015-16 season, so no they weren't a superteam.

Klay's a great #2 in the Scottie Pippen mold, but there's no period in the modern NBA where a guy like Draymond is even considered an All-Star, let alone a superstar. You go back to the 00s and the guy doesn't even get All-Star consideration when he's competing with the likes of Duncan, Garnett, Nowitzki, Webber, etc. in the West. He's a great role player--that's it. You can't be a superteam with just two star players.

That 2nd round series when the Blazers were about to tie the series 2-2 and were blowing the Warriors out in Game 4, until Steph came back from his injury and produced that legendary performance revealed just how ordinary the Warriors were without him.

Steph deserves full credit for their run that season.

That was the consensus that they were

Bron = 25+ scorer
Kyrie = 20+ scorer
Love = 26 And 12 the year before


They had waiters, traded nothin to the Knicks to get shump and jr and traded for mosgov.



Even going into the offs(before love got hurt) most had Cavs winning it all

Have a star already on your roster and during the offseason get prime bron and prime Kevin to join the team and say the team ain’t a super team brehs

So why do people deny this though? All you gotta do is watch how the games unfolded back then. Warriors were no were near a Super Team. They just played great together.

 

[Cladyclad]

I done heard people say

Klay ain’t a top 30 player
Draymond is trash and only good because of the system
Curry ain’t a top 3 pg

But then turn around and say they are a super team

Real talk Steve & that coaching staff>>>>> GS talent