We need to have a discussion….. because this IS NOT SEXUAL ASSAULT…

[Malcolmxxx_23]

If I invite you to my hotel room, especially late at night and you accept, I'm assuming your down to fukk. If you ain't trying to fukk just decline my invitation.

If thats the case..tell her upfront and let her decide

"Im trying to fukk whats up"

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

human beings do not speak like this.

Obviously not in those terms but u get my point

 

[Ya Sinning Mane]

Damn I’m glad women feel good enough to approach me

cause at this rate I’m not cold approaching ever again.

I don’t wanna be mistaken for a perv

 

[HARLEM AL]

It isn't hard to ask "do you mind if I kiss you?"
You got to know how to read them. If you two are on the couch just make eye contact, smile, and ask if it's ok if you get closer.
It isn't rocket science.

Oh yeah? And watch that p*ssy dry up.


They are playing a dangerous game. Men are already scared to talk to women.

I’m blaming him though. He shouldn’t have had her no where near him. There’s plenary of p*ssy out there.

 

[richaveli83]

If thats the case..tell her upfront and let her decide

"Im trying to fukk whats up"

I can only assume that she knows what's up when I extend that invitation. There have been times where I've gone on dates and I make the offer of going to my place and we ended up fukking. The ones that declined I respected their decision and KIM. It's a slippery slope in this era of Me Too.

 

[8WON6]

Obviously not in those terms but u get my point

and lost in all this, when she said "NO" clearly...he stopped. People are framing it as if a full on [r-word] happened. And that's where are couple people are arguing from, instead of just the fact he made a move, got rejected, and he accepted the rejection.

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

I can only assume that she knows what's up when I extend that invitation. There have been times where I've gone on dates and I make the offer of going to my place and we ended up fukking. The ones that declined I respected their decision and KIM. It's a slippery slope in this era of Me Too.

To avoid any issues..just invite or mess with females who show super high interest


Cause a lot of bros are not calibrated enough

 

[The God Poster]

So he forced himself on her, kissed her with his tongue deep in her mouth, she pushed him away and you don’t think it’s sexual assault?

Does he have to stick his penis in her twat for you to consider it as sexual assault?

The main issue I have is people In general wouldn’t care if the roles were reversed

Unless they were dating or leading to that direction randomly kissing someone is def assault

 

[Gold]

alotta ya'll gonna end up losing your job or getting some shyt. ya'll dont get it

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

and lost in all this, when she said "NO" clearly...he stopped. People are framing it as if a full on [r-word] happened. And that's where are couple people are arguing from, instead of just the fact he made a move, got rejected, and he accepted the rejection.

Randomly kissing a girl is assault

Why is that hard to understand lol
Even though he stopped after she said NO

Too late..its still assault

 

[FeverPitch2]

I've seen this a lot lately.
Brehs are now going super PC and subscribing to women's line of thinking in regards to a few topics.
Especially when it comes to the definition of sexual assault, the concept of toxic masculinity, etc.
Regardless of each individual's guilt or innocence, the public demonization of Cosby, Jackson, Kelly, Weinstein, Lauer, Cuomo, etc, got nikkas shook out here.
Look at Charlamagne, after coming close to the guillotine, he's been the poster boy for intersectionality.

While it's not okay to sexually assault or harass anyone, and unhealthy male behavior must be unlearned, women have to evolve along with us for it work.
It's impractical and more importantly, hypocritical for women to demonize men for their unhealthy behaviors but still defiantly hold on to their own unhealthy behaviors, as if it is their right.
What is the point of demonizing or invalidating certain sexual and social mores and norms as toxic, but still demanding that men still engage in those behaviors when women see fit?
For example, to rail publicly about "toxic masculinty" but then turn around and desire a "thug" for a life partner.
To the extreme of saying publicly, that a man must be a murderer to meet her romantic requirements, or that she has to see has to witness him commit violence to meet her romantic criteria.

We gotta come to an agreement on what's what and it can't be as vague and nebulous as it's been so far.

 

[RedCloakBlackWraithe]

In 2021's world you dumbfukk. What part of society is changing do you weirdo niccas don't understand? Back in the days these social cues mean something now it's obvious women as a whole are confused as fukk and in the middle of a transition and as such if you want to avoid being a creep you should approach women generally with the understanding that you need to be explicit with the situation.

lol internet, twitter, none of it is real life b. outrage culture not real to everyday humans.

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

I've seen this a lot lately.
Brehs are now going super PC and subscribing to women's line of thinking in regards to a few topics.
Especially when it comes to the definition of sexual assault, the concept of toxic masculinity, etc.
Regardless of each individual's guilt or innocence, the public demonization of Cosby, Jackson, Kelly, Weinstein, Lauer, Cuomo, etc, got nikkas shook out here.
Look at Charlamagne, after coming close to the guillotine, he's been the poster boy for intersectionality.

While it's not okay to sexually assault or harass anyone, and unhealthy male behavior must be unlearned, women have to evolve along with us for it work.
It's impractical and more importantly, hypocritical for women to demonize men for their unhealthy behaviors but still defiantly hold on to their own unhealthy behaviors, as if it is their right.
What is the point of demonizing or invalidating certain sexual and social mores and norms as toxic, but still demanding that men still engage in those behaviors when women see fit?
For example, to rail publicly about "toxic masculinty" but then turn around and desire a "thug" for a life partner.
To the extreme of saying publicly, that a man must be a murderer to meet her romantic requirements, or that she has to see has to witness him commit violence to meet her romantic criteria.

We gotta come to an agreement on what's what and it can't be as vague and nebulous as it's been so far.

Sounds like you been reading too many twitter hoe babble

99 percent of the women do not prefer thugs

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

it is sexual assault because he a goofie with n o game.
trying to make a move on a female at work.
which if you thorough.
you should not be shytting where you eat.
unless you live with game to pull it off.
in a pro environment.
you asking to have a social anything is a business proposal.
that if you make an advance. Is predatory in nature.
whether you are cognitive or prescient or not.
Ignorance is not an excuse.

yep. it's in the workplace context. there are states that specifically have laws for sexual battery if a superior or person of authority is involved. people don't be knowing the legalities, then be trying to have legal conversations based on feelings

it's not hard to say "hey i like you, can we go on a date?". otherwise,

#keepyourhandstoyourself

 

[ill_will82]

Still baffled women go back to a man’s living space or hotel and expect not get hit on, or him not to make a move

This really needs to be said or look at in some sense b/c in this day age women can't continue to act this dumb or be this stupid. I'm sorry but I can't get w/bullshyt.

If you're a woman and you make a conscious decision to go to a man's hotel room or home you need to make your intentions clear from jump. Dudes need to stop being so damn thirsty and read the room. It will cut the bs down if ppl kept the interactions real simple.