I would say the opposite: can’t be single for a long time.
The type of broad who historically has never been without a boyfriend for an extended period
of time, and/or has very small intervals between her relationships.
I.E.:
- when the news hits that she’s single again, it’s like the Bat Signal flashes in the sky and her phone/social media starts to blow up
- “so...what are we?” conversation comes up real early with her
- breaks up with her fiancé, has a new boyfriend two weeks later
- been engaged twice, and she’s only 25
think we are discussing different sides of the same coin.
If a women is jumping from relationship to relationship that is a red flag however if loyalty/monogamy is there well, Atleast she has that going for her.
with women are single a long long time I find them to be
1) used to juggling multiple men & dates at a time. That whole “well if there ain’t a ring on it it’s fair game”. Mentality.
2) typically always the ones who are quick to fall for someone but the quicker u fall typically the quicker u leave (you do one wrong thing in the dating phase your gone).
3. Grow up and finally change their standards from ain’t shyt dudes to “good guys”. I applaud this & do believe people can change. But her standards usually change from a 2 to an 8 and her herself changes from a 3 to a 4.
& most importantly I actually do believe things happen for a reason, and if your single for a long long time there is usually good reason. I go to the supermarket multiple times in a week & see the same apple there over and over it’s usually other people are telling me something I might not see.
Both instances are not ideal, but if I had to choose between perpetually in a relationship versus single for extended periods I would choose the former.