What Is The End Game For African Americans And African Diapora Nations?

What's your end game?

  • Sovereignty

  • Reparations

  • Pan Africanism

  • Just wanna be left alone

  • Land

  • Reclaim "lost" culture

  • Money

  • Development

  • Economic freedom

  • Not thought about it

  • PAWG in peace (integrate with the world)

  • Big payback ....

  • Justice (explain)

  • We good right now/no end game


Results are only viewable after voting.

T'challa

Rookie
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
76
Reputation
90
Daps
360
Reppin
Wakanda, Biafra
Africa is big. I'd prefer a regional start to such agreements before achieving a continental wide agreement. Perhaps I'm overly cautious.

I agree with your caution.

Speaking further about supranational bodies, in the final analysis I tend towards pulling out/scrapping AU/ECOWAS. Here's my line of thought when it the AU and ECOWAS.

I really cannot think about any future with them because they are completely useless and answer to money - AU to EU, ECOWAS to EU/Nigeria. My good guess is we will not be members of these since we have seen firsthand, their powerlessness in the Biafran cause. Also remember what OAU told us in 1968.

Also, the multi-layer bodies is a bureaucratic hindrance and the issue of jurisdiction is a nightmare .

I believe we will start a new supranational body. I don't think well want a proliferation (as it is currently) of these so I'm thinking we try to make it single as much as possible.

We start out as a 1 or 2 member body (Ambazonia in mind here), we need to be careful to get only members of similar ideals and drive to be the founding members. The nations that join hereafter are agreeing to the already existing laid down statutes and guides. We need to avoid this strange bed fellows thing like we have in the AU and ECOWAS now. For e.g. a dictatorship cannot be a member. Internal referendums for Berlin constructed states (more info here --> www.oeas.info).

As with any human organization there will be drivers and there'll be those that joined just to mark the register. The key is that such a body is shaped by such founding members.

I didn't go with region because I rather be in a body with some sensible nation like Botswana than one with La Republic de Cameroon or Nigeria (if it still exists).
 
Last edited:

The Odum of Ala Igbo

Hail Biafra!
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
17,969
Reputation
2,950
Daps
52,735
Reppin
The Republic of Biafra
I agree with your caution.

Speaking further about supranational bodies, in the final analysis I tend towards pulling out/scrapping AU/ECOWAS. Here's my line of thought when it the AU and ECOWAS.

I really cannot think about any future with them because they are completely useless and answer to money - AU to EU, ECOWAS to EU/Nigeria. My good guess is we will not be members of these since we have seen firsthand, their powerlessness in the Biafran cause. Also remember what OAU told us in 1968.

Also, the multi-layer bodies is a bureaucratic hindrance and the issue of jurisdiction is a nightmare .

I believe we will start a new supranational body. I don't think well want a proliferation (as it is currently) of these so I'm thinking we try to make it single as much as possible.

We start out as a 1 or 2 member body (Ambazonia in mind here), we need to be careful to get only members of similar ideals and drive to be the founding members. The nations that join hereafter are agreeing to the already existing laid down statutes and guides. We need to avoid this strange bed fellows thing like we have in the AU and ECOWAS now. For e.g. a dictatorship cannot be a member. Internal referendums for Berlin constructed states (more info here --> www.oeas.info).

As with any human organization there will be drivers and there'll be those that joined just to mark the register. The key is that such a body is shaped by such founding members.

I didn't go with region because I rather be in a body with some sensible nation like Botswana than one with La Republic de Cameroon or Nigeria (if it still exists).

AU is entirely useless, I agree. Replacing it won't be difficult. ECOWAS is largely useless as well. Honestly, I don't mind avoiding such bodies until we can create useful alternatives. The desire for change is rampant, so the mere presentation of sensible alternatives will inspire hearts across Africa.

Biafra has a role to play. Let us enter the stage!
 

T'krm

Superstar
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
3,554
Reputation
705
Daps
13,441
Reppin
BA DOS Af pr
"Repatriations, maintaining the current resources that our ancestors fought for in this country and preserving/pronouncing our cultural identity." Those are some African American talking points and what appears to be the end game for now.

My personal endgame is some fantasy Afrofuturism Utopia shyt but I'm most likely gonna never see that :mjlol:
Real vs abstract..Wonder how'd they'd converge
Haven't seen any additions from Afro-carribeans/latinos, yet:jbhmm:

Ok. Reclaim culture- Aside from language being already heavily entrenchedmore afrodescendientes need to centralize culture base, and identity around 'Black identity', *Hence avatar.
Soverignty- Afrodescendientes are perhaps most marginalized, and w/o means to self-identity(beyond entertainment), thus self-govern, & most live in segregated communities, but soverignty on a communal level wouldn't be outside realms of possibility. Finding ways to acheive that would greatly be aiding by finding a way to link with the most powerful group: AmericanDos, some what...how?:hubie:
 
Last edited:

T'challa

Rookie
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
76
Reputation
90
Daps
360
Reppin
Wakanda, Biafra
Updated Top 5/6

1 Economic freedom 33 votes
2 Sovereignty 26 votes
3 Development 22 votes
4 Pan Africanism 20 votes
5 Land 18 votes
5 Reparations 18 votes
 

Asicz

Presume the unpredictable
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
14,022
Reputation
-5,280
Daps
33,097
Reparations for selling black Americans into slavery.
 
Top