Can we also talk about right-wing libertarians absolutely hijacking and b*stardizing the libertarian (i.e., anarchist) tradition?![]()
Freedom for the Koch brothers breh

It's so beautiful

Can we also talk about right-wing libertarians absolutely hijacking and b*stardizing the libertarian (i.e., anarchist) tradition?![]()


Please give me examples of capitalist property rights and relations anywhere widespread before roughly 1600 ad. And arguing that property rights exist in a vacuum separate and independent from the state, and thus didn't arise because of the state's protection, is the definition of appealing to natural law.
Smdh I ask you nicely not to point out my fallacies and here you go, calling my strawman. Again, please don't own me with your extremely spectrum logic knowledge. It's unfair and frankly unacceptable
Can we also talk about right-wing libertarians absolutely hijacking and b*stardizing the libertarian (i.e., anarchist) tradition?![]()
But proto-anarcho capitalist would be your classical liberals of the individualist bent like Hebert Spencer, JB Say, Bastiat, Mollinari and etc.
Don't you think?
Yet you had early anarchist who would be looked at today as anarcho capitalist, which proves that anacaps and its principles have been around the anarchist movement from the beginning. Which in turns falsifies your claim that it can't exist or that its a contradictory term.No, because anarchism stands against all forms of oppression and social hierarchy. There's no such thing as "anarcho-capitalism," except as a fantasy of the rich where they'd be able to do as they please with no one to check them
Me and my band of rowdy commies

Few do.Honest question
I really don't know too much about them, but I'm listening to this town hall and they seems a lot less crazy than the other two.
But, I know people always refer them as crazy.
School me, brehs![]()
Sorry, the title for mass misunderstanding of, and lack of knowledge on by most people goes to Marxism & SocialismFew do.
This is the issue, plain and simple...

Johnson responded to the BLM question in a more genuine way than Trump's ranting or Hillary's scripted and focus-audience tested responses.Their Alex Jones types. Those are usally 100% white supremacist. Since I am against that, I am 100% against them.
Yet you had early anarchist who would be looked at today as anarcho capitalist, which proves that anacaps and its principles have been around the anarchist movement from the beginning. Which in turns falsifies your claim that it can't exist or that its a contradictory term.
You have to understand that right?
who are some of these historical people you speak of?who are some of these historical people you speak of?
