I am talking about moving on from a guy that isn't what you expected him to be or what you are paying him to be. If the squad was making the playoffs or the offense was beastly year in and year out then it would be one thing but that ain't the case so yeah it's time to move on from that failure.
When can we get rid of stafford?
I am talking about moving on from a guy that isn't what you expected him to be or what you are paying him to be. If the squad was making the playoffs or the offense was beastly year in and year out then it would be one thing but that ain't the case so yeah it's time to move on from that failure.
I don't have emotional ties to expectations or draft status. Are we going to replace him with a better qb or aren't we? As deluded as you are, you've yet to represent any attainable qb as a better qb than Matthew Stafford. Since it's so tough to find someone better, that's cause to rethink things eh?
yseJ
Empire strikes back
Again what's stopping you from drafting a rookie and developing him? With your logic Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady would've never gotten a chance because they were at some point much worse than the teams starting qbs.
You are so afraid to change a qb it's hilarious. You qb stans protecting your precious qbs like gollum except there's no fukking ring
Again what's stopping you from drafting a rookie and developing him? With your logic Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady would've never gotten a chance because they were at some point much worse than the teams starting qbs.
You are so afraid to change a qb it's hilarious. You qb stans protecting your precious qbs like gollum except there's no fukking ring
Only that's what I clearly stated page 1.
You have yet to provide me with an example of a team that won SBs as a result of hanging onto and overpaying an average QB.
Cheaper/attainable options with higher QB rating this year:
Tyrod Taylor, Bridgewater, McCown, Foles, McCown. Bu...bu...but none of those guys could have us at 0-3 an in the bottom 3rd of the league offensively
.
Being capable for one year (2011) gets you paid. Ask Tannehill, Kaep, etc. Theres only a few qbs who are good to great year in and year out and if that isnt your qb he shouldnt get a second big contract.Again what's stopping you from drafting a rookie and developing him? With your logic Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady would've never gotten a chance because they were at some point much worse than the teams starting qbs.
You are so afraid to change a qb it's hilarious. You qb stans protecting your precious qbs like gollum except there's no fukking ring
You have yet to provide me with an example of a team that won SBs as a result of hanging onto and overpaying an average QB.
Cheaper/attainable options with higher QB rating this year:
Tyrod Taylor, Bridgewater, McCown, Foles, McCown. Bu...bu...but none of those guys could have us at 0-3 an in the bottom 3rd of the league offensively
Teddy bridgewater isn't attainable, the others maybe in 2016. I'll certainly revisit this hilarious post after the season.
yseJ
Empire strikes back
That's fair, there might be some hope for you after all
The Lions could have attained Bridgewater in the draft he was drafted in so how was he not attainable?
The most prolific passer at age 27 in league history has one year eh? Okie dokie
I'm speaking from the prospective of this coming offseason.
Well there will only be more guys that we could've had that become unattainable as we hold on to this average ass nikka
.
We just shouldn't have paid him that much. I think he can definitely win some games. I do think he is top 15. I just wanted more for that money. And I do think we need some qb competition in there. He needs to feel a little fire.
What does most prolific mean exactly? Yards?
