When will the USA get its first African American president

A Tribe Called Quest ™

Make Em Say Ughh ... Silk da Shocker
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
18,929
Reputation
-937
Daps
47,353
Reppin
Chiraq
if history starts in 1970....oh wait you got 13 year old Black boys being executed by the state for having a BB gun in 2016.


Now granted this after Gaddafi died but still we know the message of how his people felt even though Gaddafi was tricking yall with Pan-Africanism :mjlol:
 

CriticalThought

All Star
Joined
Feb 18, 2014
Messages
906
Reputation
595
Daps
3,290
Because that's how Libyans felt along breh :mjlol: It's better for Blacks to GTFO out of Libya than to stay over BS work:upsetfavre:. The man was going to have to go in hiding breh he was not lasting in Libya long kind of the same way nikkas think Omar Bashir is still running shyt in Sudan when that nikka hasn't stepped foot in Khartoum or Omdurman since when:mjlol:

The facts remain, it wasn't Libyans who were responsible for the overthrow, it was outsiders. If let alone, there would have been no regime change. No Responsibility to Protect= no air power, which would be the same that you see in Syria today. The narrative he fell because all Libyans wanted him gone, well some did. Others fought to the death. It was Europeans who wanted him out, and used their military might to make that happen.If they stayed out of it, none of the shyt going on now would be going on. The whole organic narrative of everyone hating him is wrong. It's the narrative pushed by the media to make people believe the same lies like Iraq.

But it's over with now. They were stupid and mislead and have been paying the price for it for years now. Which "government" they're under now, well roll the dice there's a couple to choose from. :yeshrug:
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,494
Daps
246,436
One of the clear cut goals was to bring down the regime(s) of whatever state they were demonstrating in

No, regime change for the sake of regime change was not a goal in itself. They were under the assumption their society would be changing for the better. No one without agenda in 2016 would call the Arab Spring anything but a failure.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,427
Daps
111,968
The facts remain, it wasn't Libyans who were responsible for the overthrow, it was outsiders. If let alone, there would have been no regime change. No Responsibility to Protect= no air power, which would be the same that you see in Syria today. The narrative he fell because all Libyans wanted him gone, well some did. Others fought to the death. It was Europeans who wanted him out, and used their military might to make that happen.If they stayed out of it, none of the shyt going on now would be going on. The whole organic narrative of everyone hating him is wrong. It's the narrative pushed by the media to make people believe the same lies like Iraq.

But it's over with now. They were stupid and mislead and have been paying the price for it for years now. Which "government" they're under now, well roll the dice there's a couple to choose from. :yeshrug:
Eh, even with all the information we have now, violent political repression and state sanction ethnic-cleansing/genocide still wasn't a fargone possibility.
I want to like Qaddafi but who knows what would have happened without outside intervention.
 
Top